Search This Blog



Planetary Motions
, published by Giant Steps Press, is now available on Amazon for $14.95. The Giant Steps website is https://giantstepspress.com/.



Spoor of Desire: Selected Poems
is available for $16.00 from FootHills Publishing, P.O. Box 68, Kanona NY 14856 or see www.foothillspublishing.com.

Tourist Snapshots was available from Randy Fingland's CC Marimbo, P.O. Box 933, Berkeley CA. CC Marimbo has, unfortunately ceased publishing, though I still have a few copies to spare.

Dada Poetry: An Introduction was published by Nirala Publications. It may be ordered on Amazon.com for $29.99 plus shipping. American buyers may order a copy from me for $23 including shipping.

Each book is available from the author William Seaton.


A categorized index of all work that has appeared on this site is available by looking under the current month in the Blog Archive section and selecting Index.


This site is listed in BlogCatalog and

Literature Blogs
Literature blog








Showing posts with label Occitania. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Occitania. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 1, 2021

Nineteenth Century Versions of Jaufre Rudel

 

     Texts of the poems discussed are appended to this essay.  Numbers in brackets refer to endnotes while those in parentheses are line numbers.

 

     The twelfth century Troubadour Jaufre Rudel enjoyed a sort of vogue during the nineteenth century, not so much for his verses as for his legendary biography. [1]  The medievalist taste of the era, familiar from works like Tennyson’s Idylls of the King and pre-Raphaelite painting, found his vida irresistible.  The poet’s apparent death during the second Crusade and his works celebrating the value of “amor de lonh” (“love from afar”) were the basis for the tale that, in spite of never having seen her, he had fallen in love with the Countess of Tripoli, an area in northern Lebanon and parts of western Syria then under European rule.  The vida relates that he fell ill while traveling and survived only long enough for the noble lady to arrive and embrace him, so impressing her that she thereupon entered a convent.  The cansos themselves are perhaps most productively read as expressions of a super-refined love, purified almost to the point of transcending the physical altogether under an impulse similar to that which underlies the stilnovismo of Dante.  Like the mystical poems of Mechthild and John of the Cross, they express the simultaneous selflessness and selfishness of love, the intense desire for union with another, never quite satisfied except perhaps in moments of transport.

     For the nineteenth century, though, the poems were beside the point.  Appropriations of Jaufre arose from the vida alone.  Though the theme of the exaltation of love persisted and the basic terms of the story remained consistent, the legend was put to a variety of uses.  A survey of poems appropriating the story by Uhland, Heine, Swinburne, and Carducci will, not surprisingly, indicate the attitudes and values not of the Middle Ages, but of the more modern era.  Like other literary conventions, the narrative elements some Structuralists would call mythemes are capable of embodying a variety of meanings and engendering multiple variations.

     Ludwig Uhland’s “Rudello” (1815) is a Romantic myth idealizing Provence as a poetic land in a way similar to Keats’ attitude toward ancient Greece, implicitly praising strong emotion while describing a hero doomed for loving too much.  Yet there is little darkness in this spiritualized whimsy, later set to music by Schumann.  The opening, reminiscent of a medieval allegory, fancifully traces the parentage of the courtly love lyric, southern France’s “reichste Blüte” (“finest flower”) (11), to “Frühling” (spring) and “Minne” (love).  In Uhland’s telling, the poet’s passion is so potent that it summons up the spirit of the beloved who sweeps about his chamber as an apparition.

Denn nur in geheimen Nächten

Nahte sie dem Sänger leise,

Selbst den Boden nie berührend,

Spurlos, schwank, in Traumesweise. (25-28)

 

(For only in the shrouded night does she softly approach the singer, never even touching the floor, without a trace, wavering, in the manner of a dream.”

 This insubstantial vision came to him verbally, through her Märe (34), her reputation, a word which suggests Märchen or fairy tale, and she then becomes the inspiration for his own poetry.

 

Wollt er sie mit Armen fassen,

Schwand sie in die Wolken wieder,

Und aus Seufzern und aus Tränen

Wurden dann ihm süße Lieder. 29-32

 

(Should he try to take her in his arms, she will vanish into vapor, and from his sighs and tears sweet songs came to him.)

      Arriving in the Countess’ port, he expires as she approaches, eliciting her tributes in the form of a funeral, a monument, and the making of gilded codices of his poetry with jeweled covers, until she is taken by the same sort of “unnennbaren Sehnen” (“ineffable longing”) (80) he had experienced, leading her to seek a cloistered life.  Thus perfect love is placed just beyond language and beyond the possibility of realization; unsatisfied desire is the result of even the greatest love.  The trajectory is set toward the Liebestod of Wagnerian drama in which fulfillment occurs only with extinction and the lover descends unconscious and drowns (“ertrinken,/ versinken ---/ unbewußt”) in the moving totality of the world breath. (“in des Welt-Atems wehendem All”).

     In Heinrich Heine’s “Geoffroy Rudèl und Melisande von Tripoli” [2] the vida becomes the basis for a ghost story reminiscent of E. T. A. Hoffman, told in the form of a ballad rather than a Gothic Novelle.  Heine’s innovations include imagining tapestries illustrating the story woven by his beloved, including the moment of the poet’s death.  “Alas!  The welcoming kiss was at the same time a kiss of farewell.”  (“Ach! der Kuß des Willkomms wurde/ Auch zugleich der Kuß des Scheidens  21-22)  The tone is that of a gossipy raconteur, a host perhaps, relating a curious and colorful local legend.  Even the narrative of Jaufre’s life is here secondary, though.  The focus is on the spectral hijinks of the lovers’ spirits who flitter about like spooks in an Ub Iwerks cartoon. 

 

In Blay Castle every night

One hears a rustling, cracking, shaking, 

The tapestry figures

Suddenly come to life.

                                   (25-28)

 

In dem Schlosse Blay allnächtlich

Gibt's ein Rauschen, Knistern, Beben,

Die Figuren der Tapete

Fangen plötzlich an zu leben.

 With the coming of day, these insubstantial specters “shyly scurry back” (“huschen scheu zurück” 67) to being nothing but interior decoration.  The intended effect is quaintness, picturesqueness, just the sort of thing tourists might be told on a castle tour.  The profundity of the poet’s love is replaced by his oddly curious fate.              

     Algernon Charles Swinburne’s “The Triumph of Time” uses the Jaufré legend as the basis for a typically self-dramatizing pose with its persona swooning near death when denied his love.  The stanza is elaborate with iambs stumbling over anapests in breathless tetrameters that snap to order at each line’s end, regularly rhyming ababccab.  The poet’s legend is related in a few lines.  Due to his love for the distant lady he hinds himself failing “for her love’s sake.”  (325)  She approaches, bids him “Live” (331), and he revives for a moment, enjoying then the full joys of love, so that he dies “praising God for his gift and grace. (329)  Lest this be taken as a dramatic climax, it is followed by eight stanzas of the poet’s lamenting his greater suffering.  He vows never again to smell roses. (353)  Moreover, he spitefully declares, “I shall hate sweet music my whole life long.” (360)  Planning to continue his protestations into the afterlife, he concludes “If I cry to you then, will you hear or know?” (392)

     For Swinburne Jaufré’s story turns out to be simply the case of a lover in less distress than his own.  Still he works up considerable froth with his usual overwrought protestations, arguing that death would be far preferable to his death-in-life, deprived of the object of his affections who had married someone else, all the more rapidly perhaps once she glimpsed the poet in pursuit.  He expresses a passion about passion commensurate with the Troubadour’s and with a similar foregrounding of technical and musical effects.  Swinburne, here as elsewhere, dissipates his effect by excessive repetition.

     In Giosue Carducci’s “Geoffrey Rudel” (1888) Mélisande is substituted for her mother Hodierna and Bertrand, an aide to Jaufre, is introduced.  The poem begins on shipboard with the poet already mortally stricken.  The focus is on the climactic moment with the insight of the dying man who declares,

 

– Contessa, che è mai la vita?

E’ l’ombra d’un sogno fuggente.

La favola breve è finita,

il vero immortale è l’amor.     73-76

 

“Lady, what is this life of ours?

The fleeting shadow of a dream.

Now end the fable’s transient hours,

‘Tis only love that knows not death.

In cosmic affirmation of that realization, the sun suddenly breaks though and shone “dal cielo sereno” just as the princess’ blond hair falls as though beams of light (irragio) on the body of the poet. 

 

E il sole dal cielo sereno

calando ridente ne l’onda

l’effusa di lei chioma biona

su ‘l morto poeta irraggiò.”        85-88

 

The sun broke through his misty veil.

From sky serene shone on the sea.

The lady’s golden locks set free

Like light o’er the dead poet fell.”

 The poem is a stirring craftsmanlike set-piece, nearly a tableau, meant to point a moral, almost a revival of the old verses in emblem books. 

     The polysemous potential of Jaufre’s story is evident in these uses alone, but this survey far from exhausts the recent revisionary versions of the story.  Stendhal reprints the vida as section CLXIII of De l’Amour (1822) and Rostand spun out the tale over four acts in La princesse lointaine (1895), a vehicle for Sarah Bernhardt.  Twentieth century retellings include “Rudel and the Lady of Tripoli” by A. Mary F. Robinson (known also as Madame Duclaux) (1902) and A Knight's Life in the Days of Chivalry by Walter Clifford Meller (1924).  This last was a source for in Alfred Döblin’s extraordinarily ironic picture of Jaufie (as Döblin unaccountably calls the poet) in his last novel Hamlet or The Long Night Comes to an End.  Döblin seeks to undo the accumulation of Romantic and sentimental associations for the story by a distinctively bathetic treatment like Joyce had provided in Ulysses.  In this belated version Jaufie is escaping the consequences of an adulterous affair when he sails toward the princess who turns out to be old and ugly as well as a drinker of human blood (in search of youth).  His real love, called Petite Lay, is a commoner, in eligible for engagement in courtly love.   These later turns of the legend are beyond the scope of this article. 

     The body of associations Döblin was overturning are apparent in the review of four nineteenth century poetic treatments from three different countries.  Though they make no changes in the fundamental terms of the story, each conveys a wholly different tone. 

     Uhland makes of Jaufre a grand Romantic ideal, though exotic and unattainable, an idealized location in time and place, itself a “love from afar,” like that later parodied in Edgar Arlington Robinson’s “Miniver Cheevy” who absurdly “loved the days of old.”  It is that retrospective view, the longing for the past, that first distinguishes this reading from the work of Jaufre itself.  Yet such a nostalgic sensibility had appeared in the vida itself, less than a century after the poet had died, a reflex placing the symbolic action with only a mediated relation to lived experience. 

     In Heine’s ballad this exalted notion of a poetic Provence is transformed into the quaint and picturesque setting for an entertaining story of poltergeist-like spirits haunting a French castle.  The focus has passed from momentous and potent emotion to the curious side-effects that followed the decease of the two lovers.  The tone is that of a storyteller, passing time about the fireside.

     One might have thought that Jaufre’s story is as extreme and extravagant an example of romantic devotion a poet might conceive.  Yet the reader of Swinburne finds that for him Jaufre is merely an occasion for the swooning aesthete to more dramatically paint his own self-portrait, recovering the emotional energy but using the medieval example to emphasize his own greater capacity for love.

     Finally, for Carducci the legend provides the occasion for an operatic full-dress scene of insight into the evanescence of experience, delineated with magisterial control.  Carducci synthesized Romanticism in his celebration of passion with a highly Classical attention to craft.

    

 

 

1.  The vida is short enough to include here in its entirety in both Old Occitan and in English.

Jaufres Rudels de Blaia si fo mout gentils hom, princes de Blaia. Et enamoret se de la comtessa de Tripol, ses vezer, per lo ben qu’el n’auzi dire als pelerins que venguen d’Antiocha. E fez de leis mains vers ab bons sons, ab paubres motz. E per voluntat de leis vezer, et se croset e se mes en mar, e pres lo malautia en la nau, e fo condug a Tripol, en un alberc, per mort. E fo fait saber a la comtessa et ella venc ad el, al son leit e pres lo antre sos bratz. E saup qu’ella era la comtessa, e mantenent recobret l’auzir e·l flairar, e lauzet  Dieu, que l’avia la vida sostenguda tro qu’el l’agues vista; et enaissi el mori entre sos bratz. Et ella lo fez a gran honor sepellir en la maison del Temple; e pois, en aquel dia, ella se rendet morga, per la dolor qu’ella n’ac de la mort de lui.

Jaufré Rudel, of Blaye, was a very noble man, prince of Blaye. He fell in love with the Countess of Tripoli, without ever having seen her, because of the good things he heard being said about her by pilgrims who came from Antioch. And he made about her many verses with good melodies but with weak wordings. And because he longed to see her, he took up the cross [= joined the Crusades] and set out to sail the seas. He fell ill in the ship and was taken to Tripoli, to an inn, near dead. The Countess was notified about him, and she came to him—came right up to his bed, and took him in her arms. He recognized that it was the countess, and, instantly, he recovered his sense of hearing and his sense of smell [for smelling her perfume], and he praised God for keeping him alive long enough for him to have the power of vision to see her. That is how he died, enfolded in her arms. She had him buried in the house of the Temple, honoring him greatly. Then she became a nun, that same day, because of the sorrow she felt over his death.

 

2.  Published in Romanzero (1851).  The Countess is the historic figure Hodierna in many retellings.  Here the role is passed down to her daughter Melisande. 

 

 

 

 

Rudello

Ludwig Uhland

 

In den Talen der Provence

Ist der Minnesang entsprossen,

Kind des Frühlings und der Minne,

Holder, inniger Genossen.

 

Blütenglanz und süße Stimme

Konnt an ihm den Vater zeigen,

Herzensglut und tiefes Schmachten

War ihm von der Mutter eigen.

 

Selige Provencer Tale,

Üppig blühend wart ihr immer,

Aber eure reichste Blüte

War des Minneliedes Schimmer.     12

 

Jene tapfern, schmucken Ritter,

Welch ein edler Sängerorden!

Jene hochbeglückten Damen,

Wie sie schön gefeiert worden!

 

Vielgeehrt im Sängerchore

War Rudellos werter Name,

Vielgepriesen, vielbeneidet

Die von ihm besungne Dame.

 

Aber niemand mocht erkunden,

Wie sie hieße, wo sie lebte,

Die so herrlich, überirdisch

In Rudellos Liedern schwebte;       24

 

Denn nur in geheimen Nächten

Nahte sie dem Sänger leise,

Selbst den Boden nie berührend,

Spurlos, schwank, in Traumesweise.

 

Wollt er sie mit Armen fassen,

Schwand sie in die Wolken wieder,

Und aus Seufzern und aus Tränen

Wurden dann ihm süße Lieder.

 

Schiffer, Pilger, Kreuzesritter

Brachten dazumal die Märe,

Daß von Tripolis die Gräfin

Aller Frauen Krone wäre;                   36

 

Und so oft Rudell es hörte,

Fühlt' er sich's im Busen schlagen,

Und es trieb ihn nach dem Strande,

Wo die Schiffe fertig lagen.

 

Meer, unsichres, vielbewegtes,

Ohne Grund und ohne Schranken!

Wohl auf deiner regen Wüste

Mag die irre Sehnsucht schwanken.     44

 

Fern von Tripolis verschlagen,

Irrt die Barke mit dem Sänger;

Äußrem Sturm und innrem Drängen

Widersteht Rudell nicht länger.

 

Schwer erkranket liegt er nieder,

Aber ostwärts schaut er immer,

Bis sich hebt am letzten Rand

Ein Palast im Morgenschimmer.

 

Und der Himmel hat Erbarmen

Mit des kranken Sängers Flehen,

In den Port von Tripolis

Fliegt das Schiff mit günst'gem Wehen.       56

 

Kaum vernimmt die schöne Gräfin,

Daß so edler Gast gekommen,

Der allein um ihretwillen

Übers weite Meer geschwommen:

 

Alsobald mit ihren Frauen

Steigt sie nieder unerbeten,

Als Rudello, schwanken Ganges,

Eben das Gestad betreten.

 

Schon will sie die Hand ihm reichen,

Doch ihm dünkt, der Boden schwinde;

In des Führers Arme sinkt er,

Haucht sein Leben in die Winde.

 

Ihren Sänger ehrt die Herrin

Durch ein prächtiges Begängnis,

Und ein Grabmal von Porphyr

Lehrt sein trauriges Verhängnis.                    72

 

Seine Lieder läßt sie schreiben

Allesamt mit goldnen Lettern,

Köstlich ausgezierte Decken

Gibt sie diesen teuren Blättern;

 

Liest darin so manche Stunde,

Ach! und oft mit heißen Tränen,

Bis auch sie ergriffen ist

Von dem unnennbaren Sehnen.

 

Von des Hofes lust'gem Glanz,

Aus der Freunde Kreis geschieden,

Suchet sie in Klostermauern

Ihrer armen Seele Frieden.                            84

 

 

Rudello

Ludwig Uhland

 

In the valleys of Provence

The courtly love song arose,

Child of springtime and of love,

Lovely, fervent companions.

 

The radiance of blossoms and sweet voices

Reminds one of its father,

The ardour of the heart and deep pining

Came to it from its mother.

 

Blessed valleys of Provence,

You were ever lushly blooming,

But your richest blossom

[Was]1 the shimmer of the courtly love song.  12

 

Those valiant, trim knights,

What a noble guild of minstrels!

Those greatly delighted ladies,

How beautifully they were celebrated!

 

Highly honoured in the choir of minstrels

Was Rudello’s worthy name,

Praised much, envied much

That woman whom he lauded in song.

 

But no one was able to ascertain

What she was called, where she lived,

She who so gloriously, transcendently

Hovered in Rudello’s songs;                                24

 

For only in secret nights

Did she quietly approach the singer,

Not ever even touching the ground,

Traceless, swaying, as in a dream.

 

If he wished to catch her in his arms,

She vanished once more into the clouds,

And out of sighing and out of tears

Sweet songs were born to him.

 

Mariners, pilgrims, crusaders

At that time brought the tidings

That the Duchess of Tripoli

Was the queen of all women;                      36

 

And whenever Rudello heard it,

He felt a pulsing within his breast,

And he felt himself compelled to go to the shore

Where the ships lay ready.

 

Ocean, precarious, turbulent,

Bottomless and limitless!

Upon your agitated desert

Mad longing might well range.

 

Far off course from Tripoli

The barque strays about with the minstrel;

Rudello can no longer withstand

The outer tempests and the inner urging.    48

 

Gravely ill he lies stricken,

But he constantly gazes eastward,

Until at the final horizon there arises

A palace in the shimmer of morning.

 

And Heaven takes mercy

On the ailing minstrel’s pleading;

Into the Port of Tripoli

The ship flies, driven by favourable winds.

 

Barely has the beautiful Duchess heard

That such a noble guest has arrived,

A guest who for her sake alone

Has travelled over the wide sea:                   60

 

Immediately with her ladies

She descends to the shore, unasked,

Just as Rudello, with tottering gait,

Steps ashore.

 

Already she extends her hand to him,

But he feels as if the ground has disappeared from under his feet;

He sinks into the captain’s arms,

And breathes his last into the winds.

 

The Lady honours her minstrel

With a stately burial,

And a monument of porphyry

Tells of his tragic fate.                                  72

 

His songs she has scribed --

All of them -- in gold letters;

Magnificently decorated covers

She places upon these precious leaves;

 

Many an hour she spends reading the book,

Alas! and oft with burning tears,

Until she too has been seized

By the nameless yearning.

 

Departed from the gay brightness of the court,

From her circle of friends,

In the stone walls of a convent

She seeks peace for her poor soul.              84

 

 

 

Geoffroy Rudèl und Melisande von Tripoli

Heinrich Heine

 

In dem Schlosse Blay erblickt man

Die Tapete an den Wänden,

So die Gräfin Tripolis

Einst gestickt mit klugen Händen.

 

Ihre ganze Seele stickte

Sie hinein, und Liebesträne

Hat gefeit das seidne Bildwerk,

Welches darstellt jene Szene:

 

Wie die Gräfin den Rudèl,

Sterbend sah am Strande liegen,

Und das Urbild ihrer Sehnsucht

Gleich erkannt in seinen Zügen.

 

 Auch Rudèl hat hier zum ersten

Und zum letzten Mal erblicket

In der Wirklichkeit die Dame,

Die ihn oft im Traum entzücket.          16

 

Über ihn beugt sich die Gräfin,

Hält ihn liebevoll umschlungen,

Küßt den todesbleichen Mund,

Der so schön ihr Lob gesungen!

 

Ach! der Kuß des Willkomms wurde

Auch zugleich der Kuß des Scheidens,

Und so leerten sie den Kelch

Höchster Lust und tiefsten Leidens.

 

 In dem Schlosse Blay allnächtlich

Gibt's ein Rauschen, Knistern, Beben,

Die Figuren der Tapete

Fangen plötzlich an zu leben.

 

Troubadour und Dame schütteln

Die verschlafnen Schattenglieder,

Treten aus der Wand und wandeln

Durch die Säle auf und nieder.            32

 

Trautes Flüstern, sanftes Tändeln,

Wehmutsüße Heimlichkeiten,

Und postume Galantrie

Aus des Minnesanges Zeiten:

 

 »Geoffroy! Mein totes Herz

Wird erwärmt von deiner Stimme,

In den längst erloschnen Kohlen

Fühl ich wieder ein Geglimme!«       40

 

»Melisande! Glück und Blume!

Wenn ich dir ins Auge sehe,

Leb ich auf - gestorben ist

Nur mein Erdenleid und - wehe.«

 

»Geoffroy! Wir liebten uns

Einst im Traume, und jetzunder

Lieben wir uns gar im Tode -

Gott Amour tat dieses Wunder!«

 

»Melisande! Was ist Traum?

Was ist Tod? Nur eitel Töne.

In der Liebe nur ist Wahrheit,

Und dich lieb ich, ewig Schöne.«       52

 

»Geoffroy! Wie traulich ist es

Hier im stillen Mondscheinsaale,

Möchte nicht mehr draußen wandeln

In des Tages Sonnenstrahle.«

 

»Melisande! teure Närrin,

Du bist selber Licht und Sonne,

Wo du wandelst, blüht der Frühling,

Sprossen Lieb' und Maienwonne!«

 

Also kosen, also wandeln

Jene zärtlichen Gespenster

Auf und ab, derweil das Mondlicht

Lauschet durch die Bogenfenster.

 

Doch den holden Spuk vertreibend,

Kommt am End' die Morgenröte -

Jene huschen scheu zurück

In die Wand, in die Tapete.             68

 

 

Geoffrey Rudel and Melisande of Tripoli

Heinrich Heine

 

In the Château Blay still see we

Tapestry the walls adorning,

Worked by Tripoli’s fair countess’

Own fair hands, no labour scorning.

 

Her whole soul was woven in it,

And with loving tears and tender

Hallow’d is the silken picture,

Which the following scene doth render:

 

How the Countess saw Rudèl

Dying on the strand of ocean,

And the’ ideal in his features

Traced of all her heart’s emotion.     12

 

For the first and last time also

Living saw Rudèl and breathing

Her who in his every vision

Intertwining was and wreathing.

 

Over him the Countess bends her,

Lovingly his form she raises,

And his deadly-pale mouth kisses,

That so sweetly sang her praises.

 

Ah! the kiss of welcome likewise

Was the kiss of separation,

And they drain’d the cup of wildest

Joy, and deepest desolation.              24

 

In the Château Blay at night-time

Comes a rushing, crackling, shaking

On the tapestry the figures

Suddenly to life are waking.

 

Troubadour and lady stretch their

Drowsy ghostlike members yonder,

And from out the wall advancing,

Up and down the hall they wander.

 

Whispers fond and gentle toying,

Sad-sweet secrets, heart-enthralling,

Posthumous gallánt soft speeches,

Minnesingers’ times recalling:                          36

 

“Geoffry! At thy voice’s music

“Warmth is in my dead heart glowing,

“And I feel once more a glimmer

“In the long-quench’d embers growing!”

 

“Melisanda! I awaken

“Unto happiness and gladness,

“When I see thine eyes; dead only

“Is my earthly pain and sadness.”

 

“Geoffry! Once we loved each other

“In our dreams; now, cut asunder

“By the hand of death, still love we,—

“Amor ’tis that wrought this wonder!”           48

 

“Melisanda! What are dreams?

“What is death? Mere words to scare one!

“Truth in love alone e’er find we,

“And I love thee, ever fair one!”

 

“Geoffry! O how sweet our meetings

“In this moonlit chamber nightly,

“Now that in the day’s bright sunbeams

“I no more shall wander lightly.”

 

“Melisanda! Foolish dear one!

“Thou art light and sun, thou knowest!

“Love and joys of May are budding,

“Spring is blooming, where thou goest!”—   60

 

Thus those tender spectres wander

Up and down, and sweet caresses

Interchange, whilst peeps the moonlight

Through the window’s arch’d recesses.

 

But at length the rays of morning

Scare away the fond illusion;

To the tapestry retreat they

On the wall, in shy confusion.                         68

 

 

 

conclusion of “The Triumph of Time”

Algernon Charles Swinburne

 

There lived a singer in France of old

      By the tideless dolorous midland sea.

In a land of sand and ruin and gold

      There shone one woman, and none but she.

And finding life for her love's sake fail,

Being fain to see her, he bade set sail,

Touched land, and saw her as life grew cold,

      And praised God, seeing; and so died he.     328

 

Died, praising God for his gift and grace:

      For she bowed down to him weeping, and said

"Live;" and her tears were shed on his face

      Or ever the life in his face was shed.

The sharp tears fell through her hair, and stung

Once, and her close lips touched him and clung

Once, and grew one with his lips for a space;

      And so drew back, and the man was dead.

 

O brother, the gods were good to you.

      Sleep, and be glad while the world endures.

Be well content as the years wear through;

      Give thanks for life, and the loves and lures;

Give thanks for life, O brother, and death,

For the sweet last sound of her feet, her breath,

For gifts she gave you, gracious and few,

      Tears and kisses, that lady of yours.               344

 

Rest, and be glad of the gods; but I,

      How shall I praise them, or how take rest?

There is not room under all the sky

      For me that know not of worst or best,

Dream or desire of the days before,

Sweet things or bitterness, any more.

Love will not come to me now though I die,

      As love came close to you, breast to breast.

 

I shall never be friends again with roses;

      I shall loathe sweet tunes, where a note grown strong

Relents and recoils, and climbs and closes,

      As a wave of the sea turned back by song.

There are sounds where the soul's delight takes fire,

Face to face with its own desire;

A delight that rebels, a desire that reposes;

      I shall hate sweet music my whole life long.

 

The pulse of war and passion of wonder,

      The heavens that murmur, the sounds that shine,

The stars that sing and the loves that thunder,

      The music burning at heart like wine,

An armed archangel whose hands raise up

All senses mixed in the spirit's cup

Till flesh and spirit are molten in sunder —

      These things are over, and no more mine.             368

 

These were a part of the playing I heard

      Once, ere my love and my heart were at strife;

Love that sings and hath wings as a bird,

      Balm of the wound and heft of the knife.

Fairer than earth is the sea, and sleep

Than overwatching of eyes that weep,

Now time has done with his one sweet word,

      The wine and leaven of lovely life.

 

I shall go my ways, tread out my measure,

      Fill the days of my daily breath

With fugitive things not good to treasure,

      Do as the world doth, say as it saith;

But if we had loved each other — O sweet,

Had you felt, lying under the palms of your feet,

The heart of my heart, beating harder with pleasure

      To feel you tread it to dust and death —

 

Ah, had I not taken my life up and given

      All that life gives and the years let go,

The wine and honey, the balm and leaven,

      The dreams reared high and the hopes brought low?

Come life, come death, not a word be said;

Should I lose you living, and vex you dead?

I never shall tell you on earth; and in heaven,

      If I cry to you then, will you hear or know?              392

 

 

 

Geoffrey Rudel

Giosue Carducci

 

“Dal Libano trema e rosseggia

su ‘l mare la fresca mattina:

da Cipri avanzando veleggia

la nave crociata latina.

A poppa di febbre anelante

sta il prence di Blaia, Rudello,

e cerca co ‘l guardo natante

di Tripoli in alto il castello.

 

In vista a la spiaggia asiana

risuona la nota canzone:

“Amore di terra lontana,

per voi tutto il cuore mi duol”.

Il volo di un grigio alcione

prosegue la dolce querela,

e sovra la candida vela

s’affligge di nuvoli il sol.          16

 

La nave ammaina, posando

nel placido porto. Discende

soletto e pensoso Bertrando,

la via per al colle egli prende.

Velato di funebre benda

lo scudo di Blaia ha con sè:

affretta al castel: – Melisenda

contessa di Tripoli ov’è?

 

Io vengo messaggio d’amore,

io vengo messaggio di morte:

messaggio vengo io del signore

di Blaia, Giaufredo Rudel.

Notizie di voi gli fur porte,

v’amò vi cantò non veduta:

ei viene e si muor. Vi saluta,

Signora, il poeta fedel. –

 

La dama guardò lo scudiero

a lungo, pensosa in sembianti:

poi surse, adombrò d’un vel nero

la faccia con gli occhi stellanti:

– Scudier, – disse rapida – andiamo.

Ov’è che Giaufredo si muore?

Il primo al fedele rechiamo

e l’ultimo motto d’amore. –     40

 

Giacea sotto un bel padiglione

Giaufredo al conspetto del mare:

in nota gentil di canzone

levava il supremo desir.

– Signor che volesti creare

per me questo amore lontano,

deh fa che a la dolce sua mano

commetta l’estremo respir! –

 

Intanto co ‘l fido Bertrando

veniva la donna invocata;

e l’ultima nota ascoltando

pietosa ristè su l’entrata:

Ma presto, con mano tremante

il velo gettando, scoprì

la faccia; ed al misero amante

– Giaufredo, – ella disse, – son qui. –

 

Voltossi, levossi co ‘l petto

su i folti tappeti il signore,

e fiso al bellissimo aspetto

con lungo sospiro guardò.

– Son questi i begli occhi che amore

pensando promisemi un giorno?

E’ questa la fronte ove intorno

il vago mio sogno volò? –

 

Sì come a la notte di maggio

la luna da i nuvoli fuora

diffonde il suo candido raggio

su’l mondo che vegeta e odora,

tal quella serena bellezza

apparve al rapito amatore,

un’alta divina dolcezza

stillando al morente nel cuore.    72

 

– Contessa, che è mai la vita?

E’ l’ombra d’un sogno fuggente.

La favola breve è finita,

il vero immortale è l’amor.

Aprite le braccia al dolente.

Vi aspetto al novissimo bando.

Ed or, Melisenda, accomando

a un bacio lo spirto che muor –

 

La donna su ‘l pallido amante

chinossi recandolo al seno,

tre volte la bocca tremante

co ‘l bacio d’amore baciò.

E il sole dal cielo sereno

calando ridente ne l’onda

l’effusa di lei chioma biona

su ‘l morto poeta irraggiò.”        88

 

 

Geoffrey Rudel

Giosue Carducci

 

“From Lebanon the cool fresh morn

Sheds rosy tremors on the sea ;

By Latin barque the cross is borne

From Cyprus sailing gallantly.

On deck stands Rudel, Prince of Blaye,

With fever faint, his yearning eyes

Seek on the heights above the bay

Where Tripoli’s fair castle lies.

 

When he beholds the Asian strand,

The famous song he sings anew.

“Love hath for you from far-off land

Filled all my heart with aching pain.”

The circlings of the grey sea-mew

Follow the lover’s sweet complaint;

On the white sails the sun grows faint.

Obscured by clouds in fleecy train.

 

The ship in the calm haven drops

Her anchor fast ; Bertrand descends

In anxious care, naught heeds, nor stops.

Toward the hill his way he wends.

With mourning trappings all bedight

The shield of Blaye is in his hand.

He hastens to the Castle height :

” Where is the Lady Mélisande?”

 

“The messenger of love I come,

I come the messenger of death.

I come to seek you in your home

From Blaye’s good lord, Geoffrey Rudel.

He caught your fame on Rumour’s breath.

Unseen he loved you, sang of you.

He comes, he dies ; this poet true.

Lady, to you sends his farewell.”     32

 

With pensive mien the lady rose,

Looked at the squire, some moments stayed,

Then a black veil around her throws,

Her face and star-like eyes to shade.

“Sir Squire,” quoth she, her words come fast,

“Let us go where Sir Geoffrey lies.

That we may bear the first and last

Word love may utter ere he dies.”

 

Beneath his fair tent pitched along

Beside the sea Sir Geoffrey lay.

In low tones sang one tender song

That told his heart’s supreme desire.

“Lord, who didst will that far away

My love should dwell in Eastern lands.

Grant that I may in her dear hands

Commit my soul as I expire.”

 

Guided by faithful Bertrand’s hand

The lady came, the last note caught.

Before the entrance Mélisande

Lingered, her heart with pity fraught.

But soon with trembling hand she threw

Her veil aside, her face left clear.

Near to her lover sad she drew.

And murmured : “Geoffrey, I am here.”    56

  

Stretched on a low divan he lay.

Turning, then vainly strove to rise;

With a long sigh the Lord of Blaye

Upon those lovely features gazed.

“is that the face, are these the eyes

Love promised one day should be mine?

Around that brow did I entwine

Vague dreams my waking thought had raised”

 

Just as the moon on some May night

Bursts through the clouds’ encircling gloom.

Flooding the earth with silvery light,

Fills it with growth and with perfume.

So to the enchanted lover seems

This tranquil beauty to impart

Sweetness divine beyond all dreams,

Filling the dying poet’s heart.

 

“Lady, what is this life of ours?

The fleeting shadow of a dream.

Now end the fable’s transient hours,

‘Tis only love that knows not death.

To one in agony supreme

Open thine arms. On the last day

I wait for thee; a kiss now may

Commend to thee my latest breath.” 80

 

The lady held him to her breast.

And bending o’er her lover pale

Upon his quivering lips she pressed

Love’s kiss of greeting and farewell.

The sun broke through his misty veil.

From sky serene shone on the sea.

The lady’s golden locks set free

Like light o’er the dead poet fell.”

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

William IX: A Study in Transformation of Convention


The curious thing about love in the poetry of William IX is that the personae are sometimes obscene, sometimes tender, sometimes idealizing after the manner of "courtly love." I seek here to make sense of this apparent self-contradiction. The notes, I am afraid, are missing.




     The small corpus of cansos by William IX of Acquitaine contains pieces representing a bewildering variety of uses of convention: melodic, rhetorical, and thematic. Since he is the first of the poets of southern France whose vernacular lyrics are extant, he has attracted a great deal of attention, and the extraordinarily broad, to many readers even self-contradictory, range of his work has been interpreted by some as historical anticipation, as though he conveniently provides an epitome of all that is to follow (thus Jeanroy, xviii or Goldin, Lyrics, 5). Others have described the same striking breadth in psychological or psychosocial terms. To Wilhelm he is "the whole medieval man" (59), and to Bond "a strong individualist" who tailored his work to different audiences (11).
     While each of these comments doubtless has some validity, they are limited by their overlooking the possibility that the answer lies not in the specific circumstances of the single series of poems, but rather in more general literary characteristics which happen to be highlighted in the scanty and provocative oeuvre of an individual. The constellation of conventional transformation available from William's work may also be viewed as a prototype or paradigm for the nature of conventional transformation in all poetry. His poems are indeed remarkable, but largely because they do in a few pages what is normally found only in a much larger volume of text; that is to say, they economically represent virtually all the possible transformational forms of certain central thematic conventions. Thus, it is hardly surprising that they could be said to contain the future, indeed, with their unusually compact encyclopedic scope, they contain the past as well. (See Dronke, Rise, Ch. 1.)
     Jeanroy's conceptual arrangement of the texts from "les pièces badines" to "la pièce du ton le plus grave" (recalling the traditional division of Biblical texts attributed to Solomon from youth to middle to old age), and -- when this criterion is inconclusive -- from the simpler to the more complex forms may be wholly unjustified as evidence for dating, but it admirably serves the present synchronic project. William's constant theme, a theme which is demonstrably present even when seemingly absent, is the investigation of the "other" in the form of woman.
     It is upon this thematic progression that Jeanroy filed the texts, and it is nonetheless appropriate for being obvious. One need not, however, assume that the poet was primarily concerned with women in the poet’s lived experience while addressing the topic so insistently. All of the biographical data, including a number of charming anecdotes, are finally irrelevant in addressing the poetry. Apart from the sort of formal play which is the special province of the aesthetic text, many thematic concerns are commonly encoded into comment about women. Among the most likely to occur to William's twentieth century readers are self-description, exploration of the nature of feudalism, of spirituality, or of the Jungian anima.
     This claim is far from denying specific referentiality for the texts, though. Rather it cautions against any interpretation which seeks hegemony for a single simple referent. The complexity and ambiguity of William's poems render irredeemably problematic any attempt to return his ideas to the world of lived experience in exhaustive prose paraphrase. What emerges unmistakably from an examination of his use of convention is not an idea or an attitude but a pattern of formal play. Only after recognizing the inherent value of this pattern as an almost musical system can the reader return to the question of the "meaning" of the poems.
     According to an ancient and universal convention the qualities of woman elude adequate formulation for the male poet. To represent this mystery, he has recourse to figures of speech, and one of the oldest and most common is the description of the woman as an animal. This may, of course, be honorific even to apotheosis as in the bestial epithets of certain Homeric goddesses or in Diane di Prima's Loba; it may on the other hand be pejorative even to the point of scurrility (as in Semonides or Juvenal). Many examples are not so unequivocally colored by a judgement. More frequent is
the complexity of Catullus 11, the Harley lyric "A waile whit as whalles bone," or Wyatt's sonnet "whoso list to hunt, I know when is an hind."
     William's poem 1 "Companho, faray un vers covinen" identifies "his" Agnes and Arsen as "dos cavalhs" in what has always been read as a coarse, masculine," double entendre. The convention is closely paralleled in blues lyrics. The closest to William's conceit is probably Charlie Patton's "Stone Pony Blues," but the same motif appears with great frequency, including in Son House's "Pony Blues" and the widespread "Easy Rider."
     It is undeniably true that William's poem, like these songs, exploits the natural association of sexual activity with riding. For the Provencal lord, the arrogant gab is built about the analogy of castle possession and domination. The announcement of the poem as "covinen" may be taken as a straightforward claim that the poem is in fact proper and that the notions that first come to the reader's mind are likely to be correct. There can be no doubt that William is explicitly celebrating male power, his own power being reinforced by state power due to his rank, and demanding the subjugation of desired women verbally, by calling them livestock, that is, mere chattels. He proclaims that he feels "erhueill" toward all. The meaning of the image on this primary level is clear, whether its performance be imagined to have produced giggles, blushes, anger, or self-satisfaction.
     The form of the poem, two eleven syllable lines followed by a fourteen syllable line, all of which rhyme, is quite distinctive within William's poetry, appearing in poems II and III as well as in I. The three are linked by tone and content as well as by prosody. The form has been traced by different investigators to popular, sacred, and Arabic models (see Bond's notes for references to the major studies). Which diachronic conjecture is more accurate may never be known. Here it is sufficient to assume that for William's time and place, the form was appropriate for generating the effect he desired. Whether his intention was direct or ironic may be ignored when considering the construction of pattern that he elaborates in the set of poems seen as a group. There can be no question that William employed this meter to mark off this series of poems as a cohesive unit, or -- what is really the same contention -- that they must be read as a unit.
     The second of them, William's poem ii ("Compaigno, non puosc mudar qu'eo no m'effrei") maintains meter, theme, and animal convention, but with a significant twist. While the beloved is called merely "lo bon conrei" ( 1. 16), that is, "the fine goods," doubtless with a pun on "con" for cunt, rather in the same manner as poem I, the description is amplified by adding information on the lady's likely reaction to such an approach. The sexism of the original begins then to be complicated by a dialectic. While the first poem had attempted to present itself as a fitting and even decorous pleasantry ("covinen" stressing its social acceptability) while sounding like a brag or gab, this poem is an unmistakable castei or castigation, a genre associated with the clergy and the law.
     Just as Marcabrun mounted grand tirades of bitter moralizing on the topic, William takes up the cause of women who are held closely as valuable possessions by their husbands, it is this practice that "disturbs" him according to the first line of the text. Mention of the woman's keepers (1. 3), her bonds (1. 6), and the apparent image of a carter all maintain the original convention deprecating women as property, but the poem goes on to describe the inevitable consequences of such oppression.
Slyly using the same horse imagery as in poem I, William warns the possessive husband that "si non pot aver caval . . . compra palafrei." This line projects the horse image back upon the man with its suggestion that if the woman is successfully prevented from arranging a courtly dalliance with a lover of her own class, she will seek out whoever is available. Though love may remain "degraded" by a bestial affair, here it is the man, acting against the "dreit" and "lei" by unfairly restricting his wife, who thus becomes something less than a fine horse, less even than a poor one, out of the picture and rejected entirely, and by his own doing.
     The meter is substantially identical to that of poem I, but since the authorial persona is here that of the learned moralist, rather than the lascivious playboy, the irony of the form has undergone a twist.
     In both of these poems, then, the image of the beloved as an animal carries associations of erotic sensuality. Likewise, both include economic semantic elements suggesting the aristocratic expectations that accompany horse ownership and which prescribe certain obligatory forms of behavior is status is to be maintained. However, the satiric horse of the second poem reverses some of the implications of the first by applying the image to the other character, the man, and by capping the claim of the first with the more extravagant claim of the second.
     While poem I's use of the horse image could be reductively paraphrased as “1 own women as 1 own horses,” the image of poem II points to something like "the man who tries to control women is lower even than a horse." The original poem's psychological assault has been returned with wit in a form that transforms and consumes the original, in which the initial ideas are assumed, and the discourse rises to a new level. What is constant in the verbal battle is the association of sexual relations with economic power and selfish interests in general, as well as the base, "animal" associations that surround the body and love, though the second text suggests that a richer sort of love exists.
     The two uses of the horse image studied thus far might be schematically represented as follows.

poem 1 poem II
man as lord woman as horse
dominates dominates
woman as horse man as less than horse

     In William's poem 111 "'iTant ai agutz d'avois conres" the opening line restates the already familiar idea of the woman as the possession of the successful courtier, even us-ing the same punning objectifying word "conres." This poem, however, proceeds rapidly into a series of tightly knotted contradictions.
     The first explicit identification of a woman with an animal is in line 5 which equates "cons gardatz" with "gorc ses peis" (an animal image heavy with suggestive connotation even on the isolated level of concrete qualities). The primary thrust of the equation is controlled by the claim that those women who are too closely guarded resemble, not an economically useful animal, but rather the lack of one. Just as the selfish male lover of poem 11 becomes less than a nag, the woman he overzealously seeks to dominate becomes less than a fish pond, a barren place, unproductive and infertile, whose unfructifying moisture mocks at its own failure to fulfill its destiny.
     Though hints of the hunt and the social power of wealth still cling to the image, its new aspect is recalled in intensified and elaborated form in the later lines: "Per un albre c'om hi tailla n'i naison [ho] dos ho treis/ E quam lo bocx es taillatz nais plus espes." (ll. 15-16) Here the almost magic fecundity promised as a reward for participation in life, the proliferation that follows from the enjoyment of the world is stated in a way that has little to do with the specific social circumstances of forestry or fishing or romance in William's time and place. The notion is exceedingly archaic, dating at least from the time of the neolithic “Venuses.” There is no gab of the ego, the talk of possession and taming vanishes before this marvel identified with woman. Rather than prudentially warning husbands that guarding their ladies may bring about results that they would prefer to avoid, this poem states "de con cals es sa lei" (1. 10) in a way more profound than the phrase may predict, and the result is incantatory, charming. The animal and even vegetable life of the forest is here no symbol for fallen human nature (fallen through sin or through realistic portrayal that deflates idealized concepts) but instead the fountain of all earthly energy. To fail to fully participate in love again here diminishes all parties, but the sanctions are defined not in social or psychological terms, but rather as the withdrawal from life itself, an act by definition bad.
     The image of the woman as animal has here been answered, not by its return upon the man as in poem II, but with a transcending figure in which the charge of animality is accepted and celebrated and sexuality is affirmed as a mysterious forest very like that in D. H. Lawrence. The original theme of male domination, which had met its answering antithesis in poem II is here transformed, in the poet's constant play with the expectations of his audience: the theme is announced, then reversed, and in poem III it may be said to be inverted (in the sense of the millennial inversions of the Sermon on the Mount), since the identification of nature with woman is accepted, but an opposite value judgement constructed. The apparent descent from man to woman to horse to fish to tree is suddenly revalued even as it is extended.
     “Farai un vers de dreit nien” (poem IV) says a great deal about the nature of language and poetry which is not to the point here, but it also continues the development of the themes of the first three texts. Here the poet directly engages the conventions recognizable to the modern reader as definitively courtly. The lover suffers madness, confusion, and physical illness; he is quite at the mercy of his obsession. Here an individual love object is mentioned for the first time and with this new element, the poet must confess the descent into subjectivity and the loss of categorical truth which must follow.
The poet's persona, which had been more than adequately constituted by lands, manors, and subject women, is now helpless before his passion for the beloved. Strangely, it is due to the very fact that the poetic persona now speaks of a specific individual that he cannot focus and is obliged to name his topic as “dreit nien,” and to stammer out contradictions. It is clear that the discourse which had begun on the level of social reality (where the myth of the social lie in nearly every culture requires the illusion of permanence) has moved to the more vulnerable levels of the ego below.
     While the beloved controls the whole poem's movement, she is present no more concretely than, say, Jaufre Rudel's “amor de lonh.” She is not identified or even characterized by the images. Animal references persist, but they have been scattered to the margins of the text.
     The horse of line 5 may remind the reader of poem I, but it is here no wildly energetic force submitting to the imperious master. Rather it is part of the absurd scene of a mount whose rider is sleeping, unconscious, the ego distracted to the point that social status is irrelevant or undefined. The ant of line 17 indicates nothing but triviality, and the rooster of line 34 is mentioned as the sign of next to nothing. What might have been a proud or ironic image of male swagger here indicates simple nonentity.
     Love then, in this poem is so disorienting that despite striving through the whole piece to get a firm grasp of his subject, to define and thus verbally master the beloved, the poet succeeds in describing only his inability to do so. "Amigu' ai ieu, so sai qui s'es." (1. 25) He cannot even see her, much less possess her.
     Thus in poem IV the woman is conspicuously absent from the poem's vocabulary of concrete imagery. The very fact that the poet cannot summon up any ready conventional declaration about woman may be said to be the theme of poem IV. This is itself a highly conventional topos, of course, dating back to Ovid and beyond, it is this weakness, this failure, this inability that emphasizes the radical profundity of his love (though it is not to the point here to determine whether the poem is ironic or straightforward). The image that has been seen in the earlier poems in what has been called direct, reversed, and inverted forms is here present by its very absence.
     In William's poem V "Farai un vers pos mi sonelh" the sleeping persona reappears, again the image of the ego at a loss, the king dethroned, but the tongue-tied helplessness of the lover before his lady is here recast in comic form. As is appropriate for the comic, low-mimetic mode, the risk at which the lover finds himself in this text is wholly physical. The “conres” earlier controlled and manipulated here returns with a vengeance as the man's flesh is savaged in an encounter too powerful for him to master.
     The threat of the power of the woman is embodied in the cat, a frequent source of obscene slang in antiquity as well as today as reference to The Maculate Muse or Eric Partridge will demonstrate. The claws of the cat make it a formidable incarnation of the vagina dentata nightmare fear in a fabliau-type anecdote which for all its light joking represents the fierce wildness of sensuality so vividly as to suggest sado-masochism.
     The usage of the poem in part resembles that of poem II in which the horse image was reversed. Here, too, the man is subject to the bestial (the cat) and wholly inferior to the animal in terms of control of his environment, but here it is not his own failings that are central, but the animal's power. He acquiesces to the two women and their cat as though he cannot resist, it is precisely as though he is in the power of a pair of witches and their familiar. The miraculous power of nature so striking in poem III here reappears in a very sinister form for all the high-spirited wit.
     A briefer account of the remaining lyrics of William IX will suffice to indicate how they fit into this unfolding pattern. In poem VI there is no imagery which corresponds to the series thus far defined, instead the use of language derived from gambling games suggests a view of love as a contest in a way closely related to the familiar battle imagery of love.
     In poem VII the first of a fully developed subclass of nature images appears. This poem opens with a reverdie introduction that seems at first to be a diminution of the marvelous forest of poem III, here rendered in a more decorative way. It seems more "conventional" in the pejorative sense because the topos is so commonplace and because it is elaborated here at far greater length than would have been necessary to suggest the idea of human love as a spark in the dynamo of nature. The code seems uneconomical and overdetermined, too "amplified," in the rhetorician's sense.
     But the reader who continues to poem VIII must wonder whether this "simple," conventional version is not merely the preparation for a surprise. In this text, the nature introduction reappears, but in reversed form. Rather than feeling the warmth of spring and thus turning to thoughts of love, the poet laments the end of warmth, recognizes the coming of winter, and feels at once the chills of the literal cold and of his rejection as a lover.
     In poem IX the image of vegetable nature resolves the contradictions the poet had earlier generated by turning darkness into light (1. 12) and illness into health (1. 35) in a cycle which is said to be uniquely capable of renewing the flesh (1. 35 "la earn renovellar").
     Poem X provides the most amplified version of the idea of the world energy seen in non-human nature, an extension of the simpler form seen in poem VII.
     Finally, in poem Xl nature is virtually absent as the poet takes leave of worldly life. The only suggestion of the corporeal is what is left behind, the husks and shells of used-up life, the vestiges of pleasure and luxury, the lordly-furs to which the poet bids adieu in the haunting last lines.
     A summary catalogue of the array of possibilities for conventional transformation which have been adduced in William's work would have perhaps six items. First, the basic convention may be stated, though what is "basic" may be far from evident. Second, the convention may be reversed; the audience's expectations may be turned backward. This may involve a reversal between two individuals, as in poem II, or, as in the case of the two nature introductions, simply a denial of the anticipated implication of the convention. Thirdly, the convention may be "inverted" by accepting its terms and then revaluing them in a novel way. A similar effect results when the basic proposition is presented along with its opposite, or by otherwise retaining the terms of the argument while radically criticizing its original meaning. A fourth possibility is that the convention may be significant in its absence is the context would create expectations for it in the competent reader but it does not appear, it may be explicitly said to be absent; it may appear only in decidedly marginal details, or it may not be mentioned at all. Finally, a fifth and sixth form of transformation of convention are characterized by the expansion by the addition of new information to the system or diminution if meaning is retained but is referred to only elliptically.
     Not all of these will occur in a given text, of course, or even a given body of texts, and not all have been equally evident in William's poems, but they form an adequate working inventory of possibilities to analyze the operations of convention in other texts. For William's work the implications of this view of convention are rich and suggest a range of questions of practical criticism, of interpretation, and of literary theory.
     The apparent inconsistency of William's work is seen now as an extraordinary completeness. Critics who seek to establish a historical or psychological basis for this scope will not appreciate the poet's achievement in constructing a lyric encyclopedia of attitudes, aiming for a special sort of sublimity available only to the all-inclusive. Far from indicating frivolity and muddle-headedness, this encyclopedic tendency is common among many poetic works in other genres accepted in the traditional canon of greatness such as the epic and the anatomy. The reader wishing to understand William's work as a structural field of related attitudes and impulses need not reconcile contradiction nor relegate works which seem to interfere with a given thesis to a secondary rank (e.g. "merely facetious"). The reader must rather pursue the patterns themselves in the spirit of Socrates' acceptance of comedy and tragedy as equally sublime forms of drama, and trace the oppositions they describe to define not what love is, but in what terms its problem may be stated. Poetry's peculiarity as a form of linguistic technology is just this resistance to paraphrase, this embrace of inconsistency, ambiguity, and mystery.
     Thus, in the larger question of the definition of courtly love (still a living issue since many critics continue to assume the old paradigm based on Andreas Capellanus despite the patent variety among so-called courtly texts), the same maneuver may be applied to the whole cultural phenomenon. The old notion of a chivalric ideal of romance, and the answering claim of a demystifying physical sense of sensuality are properly seen as complementary. Neither the old textbooks which focused on Chaucer's "Knight's Tale" nor the new which omits it in favor of the Miller's will do; the student must be given both.
     This attitude by no means denies the evolution of the concept of love through history. It merely resists claiming absolute novelty and hegemony for a single and repeating set of linguistic and behavioral conventions. In a similar way, the recurrent discussions of irony in medieval literature in which some scholars see innovative defamiliarizing twists where others see only replication of past models must be reconsidered if irony is no more "critical" of received ideas than its lack.
     The formal play of conceptual elements, what Found called logopoeia then comes into its own as a fundamental poetic technique. In the Middle Ages melodies in poems were often admired as much as the words, but this new sense of conceptual play reminds the reader that there are melodies in ideas, too. Logopoeia as an essential element of poetic practice is no more linked to referentiality than prosodic patterns are. The poems concepts constitute an intellectual melody upon which the author may work variations for their formal value alone, as in the sonnet sequences of the Elizabethans or the psalms of the ancient Hebrews where a wide variety of moods are melodiously concatenated. Thus William is willing to entertain a full range of concepts of women in part simply to elaborate the widest inventory of choices and to delight in manipulating the expectations of his audience, tugging and teasing the competent reader.
     This idea of the poem as an exercise demonstrating all the logical permutations of an idea suggests how it may be relished in an abstract way just as a fugue proceeds through variations and inversions or artistic works such as the mandalas of Tantric Buddhism display beneficent and malevolent aspects of deity side by side in a symmetrical but ambiguous arrangement.
Referentiality, though, is never wholly lost. The cognitive value of the mandalas and of William's poetry is recoverable, but only according to the unique requirements of aesthetic interpretation, it is the peculiar task of artistic structures of the word to articulate oppositions, tensions, problematic contradictions of the sort than Levi-Strauss found to underlie myth. Clearly the "truth" about love lies more in the relation between the sexes, in the paradoxical ambiguities ("bittersweet" in Sappho's word) than in any single mood or definition.
     In the specific case of William's poetry, the crucial problems are quite clear. The alignment of one sex with social dominance produces certain tensions immediately. In any society, though, love and the aggressive desire to possess is balanced by the fear of injury or loss and the vulnerability of the need to be loved. The question is ultimately whether to be engaged or detached from the world in general, and single-minded choices, though they may accurately reflect the bent of some individual sensibilities, may not produce the finest poetry. The structure of state power in French territories, the ego less than firmly ensconced on its throne within the skull, the risk that always accompanies aspiration, the pain that sets- off pleasure -- these themes and more are evoked in William's texts in a distinctly poetic way. This aesthetic exposition is more precise than other discourses because it is more conflicted and ambiguous, because the poet delivers a whole panoply of possibilities. The role of convention is to compress and complicate the statement of the issues so that entire realms of idées reçues may be summed up and overturned in a single half-line of verse.
     The phenomenon described above, far from being peculiar to William is universal in literature and may be demonstrated wherever sufficient data are available. It may be produced also by reader's reactions as in Blake's finding Satan to be the ironic hero of Paradise Lost or in de Man's tour de force of critical reading Blindness and Insight.
     In the case of medieval European lyrics, one symptom of the dynamic principle of the transformation of convention (rather than the static construction of convention) is the problematic status of courtly love. The debate over whether such a code was dominant either poetically or socially may be resolved by the suggestion that simultaneous and opposed conventions emerged in a dialectic, complementary fashion as evidenced by William's work.

[The essay goes on to examine the earliest German Minnesang and to outline the same sort of structure of convention and its transformation.]