Search This Blog



Planetary Motions
, published by Giant Steps Press, is now available on Amazon for $14.95. The Giant Steps website is https://giantstepspress.com/.



Spoor of Desire: Selected Poems
is available for $16.00 from FootHills Publishing, P.O. Box 68, Kanona NY 14856 or see www.foothillspublishing.com.

Tourist Snapshots was available from Randy Fingland's CC Marimbo, P.O. Box 933, Berkeley CA. CC Marimbo has, unfortunately ceased publishing, though I still have a few copies to spare.

Dada Poetry: An Introduction was published by Nirala Publications. It may be ordered on Amazon.com for $29.99 plus shipping. American buyers may order a copy from me for $23 including shipping.

Each book is available from the author William Seaton.


A categorized index of all work that has appeared on this site is available by looking under the current month in the Blog Archive section and selecting Index.


This site is listed in BlogCatalog and

Literature Blogs
Literature blog








Showing posts with label Hollywood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hollywood. Show all posts

Sunday, December 1, 2024

A Month of Films

flash reviews of twenty-two films 


Actually I ended this after only three weeks.  Perhaps I am watching too many old movies, but I have little taste for most newer ones.  The selection here is not necessarily representative, though it does include some of the genres to which I regularly return: noir, old comedies, silents.  


On Approval

     On Approval, a 1944 British comedy based on Fredric Lonsdale’s play, is a most enjoyable farce, something like watered-down Oscar Wilde.  Written, produced, and Directed by Clive Brooks, who also does a grand job portraying the cynical and witty Duke of Bristol.  The cast also includes Googie Withers, Beatrice Lillie, and Roland Culver, and the two couples attract and repel each other in the most satisfyingly symmetrical way.  The opening sequence, in a documentary style, jokes about WWI, in  a way one would have thought scarcely possible during WWII, and the closing fantasy, in which photographs of the characters become animated, are unusually clever.

 

Genuine

     Everyone loves Robert Wiene’s The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, but his other films are also strong Expressionist works.  Though the original subtitle was Tragödie eines seltsamen Hauses (Tragedy of a Strange House), the film was also released as Genuine: A Tale of a Vampire, in spite of the fact that Genuine is not really a vampire.  Portrayed by Fern Andra, she is a marvelously feral woman, snapping like a beast, yet fascinating men.  The primary appeal of Genuine (1920) is certainly Cesar Klein’s wonderfully weird sets, representing a world of the imagination. 

 

The Secret Window

     David Koepp’s 2004 The Secret Window, based on a Stephen King story with a score in  part by Philip Glass, is the sort of thriller one might enjoy the first time through, but which few would care to see again.  Johnny Depp’s rumpled nerves as the main character and John Turturro’s fierce understated menace as his antagonist are creditable, but there are continuity problems.  Why did the neighbor first say he saw a stranger, and then that he didn’t if Shooter never existed?  Why does the dog exit, and we don’t ever see Mort follow him until he goes out to discover the animal’s body.  The issue of the conclusion of the story, with the alteration to killing the wife, and the revelation that Shooter means “shoot her” are one-time surprises at best.  Clues that the makers may not have felt the story quite held together might be inferred from the facts that the film has an ending different from the print story and that still another variation is on the home video version.

 

Theodora Goes Wild

     This 1936 screwball comedy directed by Richard Boleslawski delivers the requisite laughs and mild social satire of its genre with Irene Dunne as a sheltered small-town resident living with her conservative maiden aunts who is somehow the pseudonymous author of a best-selling racy novel.  Her sophistication is challenged by Melvyn Douglas, her publisher’s illustrator, who promptly makes her drunk and invites her to his apartment from which she flees.  The light play with impropriety continues when he follows her to her village and manages (in an unlikely turn of events) to become a gardener as well as later, when she returns to town holding a baby some assume to be hers.  It is all light and fluffy, if implausible.  The director, an émigré artist, had been a pioneering teacher of  Stanislavski’s methods, and Orson Welles wrote and directed a radio version, also starring Dunne, for his Mercury Playhouse in 1940.


The Garden of Allah

     Directed (like Theodora Goes Wild) by Boleslawski, this 1936 film derives its charm in  part from the exotic desert landscapes – this was only the third film made using the Technicolor process –  and in part from the acting of Charles Boyer and Marlene Dietrich.  Boyer is painfully anxious, silent, and troubled as a monk who has run away from his monastery in North Africa in search of love with Dietrich, whose role here is uncharacteristically moral and thoughtful.  Contemporary viewers will probably be surprised at the horror with which she regards his abandonment of his vocation, and might be distressed rather than impressed, at his leaving his beloved to return to the Trappists.  (Anyone who accepts the Mother Superior advising Dietrich to venture out into the sands to settle her soul will find that it is all providential.)  This piety coexists with John Carradine’s turn as a presumably Islamic diviner whose role, like that of the title, is to emphasize the story’s exciting foreignness.

 

By Candlelight

     Director James Whale showed equal talent at sophisticated comedy as he did at the horror genre for which he is best known.  This 1933 film By Candlelight, adapted from Siegfried Geyer’s play by P. G. Wodehouse, is an outstanding example.  With farce elements of mistaken identities and people shunted into back rooms just as a jealous husband is about to appear, the story is consistently amusing, and it  delivers on the “pre-Code” label with frequent double entendres and suggestive details such as when the butler adds a pillow to the bed when he expects his employer to be entertaining a lady.  Even though the plot’s parallelism is transparent early on – the butler is pretending to be a prince and the maid to be a countess -- its unfolding is consistently entertaining.

 

Desert Fury

     Lewis Allen’s 1947 Desert Fury has a familiar plot-line: the vulnerable young woman is rescued from a relationship with a criminal by the hero.  The bad guy dies and the couple glides off into a happy future.  This basic narrative is enriched and complicated by several striking elements.  Luminous, almost garish,  Technicolor photography by Edwad Cronjager and Chales Lang is accompanied by a similarly sumptuous score by Miklós Rózsa that moves from heart-stopping excitement to romantic violins, to bouncy Western themes.  What has attracted most recent notice is the clear implication of a gay relationship between the characters of John Hodiak and Wendell Corey.  Though treated as a minion by his intimate friend, the latter is fiercely jealous after Lizabeth Scott’s appearance as a rival love object.  Further, Mary Astor is represented as wishing to be her daughter’s “friend” or “sister,” taking all responsibility while shielding the younger woman from the male betrayal she had herself experienced. The late forties was the boom-time for quasi-Freudian psychological elements in movies, and plenty here invites analysis as the characters trade suggestive remarks and slap each around.  Burt Lancaster, meanwhile, is the straightest one around, if the hypermasculinity of his role as cop as well as cowboy and rodeo rider can be considered normal. 

 

The Magic Christian

     Joseph McGrath’s 1969 film The Magic Christian never holds together, in spite of the considerable talent that went into it.  The director had worked on the Goon Show and writer Terry Southern and star Peter Sellers had been in part responsible for the memorable Dr. Strangelove.  Here they are joined by Ringo Starr (who walks through his part passively as though the mere glow of Beatles fame is sufficient), John Cleese, Graham Chapman, Raquel Welch, Spike Milligan, Christopher Lee, Richard Attenborough and Roman Polanski.  Yul Brynner does a drag number, and the film’s theme is composed by Paul McCartney.  Yet still it doesn’t work.  Randomness can be effective, when incoherence itself is a meaningful stylistic choice, but it here becomes tiresome, especially since the one joke – that people will do anything for money – is repeated far too often.   The scene in which greedy and well-dressed men wallow in gore and excrement to grab a few banknotes is vitiated by the fact that it simply underlines what has been conveyed multiple times before.  More than anything else, perhaps, I was amused by Sellers’ vocal modulations at certain moments.  McGrath had worked on Hard Day’s Night and Help as well as on the Beatles’ videos featuring a number of their hits.  Simple high spirits and chaos served just fine for those productions, but a feature film requires something more.

 

Destiny

     Fritz Lang’s Destiny, originally titled Der Müde Tod, is a fantasy in  which a young women contends with death in an attempt to reclaim her lover, in the course of which three stories of tragic love and death set in exotic locales are related.  Here the art direction  is less significant than in Genuine or Caligari, though the Near Eastern and the Chinese towns are represented with more attention  to the charm of the strange than to authenticity.  The principal story is simple enough, and its conclusion in which the lovers are reunited but only in death, is familiar.  The three internal stories are likewise elementary – in each case outsiders aligned with the powers that be frustrate and ultimately bring to a violent end the lovers’ relationship.  The chief appeal of the film as a whole is simply its joyous embrace of the cinematic possibilities: flitting among historical eras and around the globe with scenes enhanced by  special effects such as double exposures and A Hi’s flying carpet.  Bernhard Goetzke’s somber performance as Death is more sympathetic than most (He asks, ”Why do people hate me simply for doing God’s will?”), though in general highly conventional, and I was surprised to learn that Lang credited his storyline not only to the Indian tale of Savitri, but more intimately to childhood dreams and visions of his own.

 

Inside Llewyn Davis

     I have no idea why both the BBC and the New York Times feature this film on their lists of the best movies since the turn of the last century.  Though I am a fan of Dave Von Ronk and an observer if the early ‘sixties folk scene, this unpleasant and shapeless story seems to me to convey very little of either.  The assault (apparently based on a true incident) has no clear meaning in relation to the period, yet it is shown twice (somewhat confusingly).  Davis is alternately explosively nasty and quietly brooding.  Jean accuses him of caring more about the lost cat than about her, but I, for one, did, the same.  I guess it would be inappropriate to expect the Coens to represent the social warmth and idealistic politics of the period.

 

Ménilmontant

     Named by Pauline Kael as her favorite film of all time, Dimitri Kirsanoff’s 1926 Ménilmontant’s lack of intertitles signifies the director’s dedication to purely visual cinematic values.  The montages, hand-held sequences, and double exposures are striking and, for the most part, effective.  Kirsanoff was originally Russian and surely owed much to Eisenstein (though he claimed to be self-taught), but he is innovative as well.  This film was his second.  He made three features and two shorts during the silent era and one feature with sound (including music by   Arthur Honegger and Arthur Hoérée, but never thereafter exercised creative control.   Every cinemaphile should watch this thirty-eight minutes of intense visual code. 

 

You're Telling Me!

     Though not one of Fields’ best films (among which I would count The Fatal Glass of Beer, The Barber Shop, The Pharmacist, International House, and anything with Mae West), You're Telling Me! (1934) is nonetheless consistently entertaining.  With Fields the whole point is his routines which he repeatedly reused and, unlike most comedians, copyrighted.  If he goes on a bit long, the viewer knows another routine will soon follow.  As usual, this film finds Fields in a small-minded burg, with plenty of gossipy ladies on his case and, here, a few ne’er-do-well male friends.  We expect character types, not realism, in this sort of comedy and he is disreputable, his long-suffering wife is censorious, and his daughter’s prospective mother-in-law snooty, all contributing to the background for his shtick.  The young lovers, as in Marx brothers plots (or, for that matter, most of Cooper’s Leatherstocking Tales), do little more than create pauses between the scenes that his audience came to see.

 

Fading Gigolo

     The viewer wonders if John Turturro’s 2013 comedy, featuring himself and Woody Allen in the leads, is having a bit of fun with itself.  Turturro is not the most obviously sexy of movie stars, and the plot is packed with implausibilities.  How likely is a dermatologist to ask her patient, a down-at-heels book dealer, if he might be able to arrange a ménage-a-trois for her?  Why does Vanessa Paradis’ Satmar character suddenly accept her suitor who had complained that she was avoiding him?  Does the rabbinical court think she’s in good standing after she says she is lonely?  What is Jade Dixon’s character doing in the story at all, except to highlight the mixture of Hasidic and Black in Williamsburg?  What will become of Murray when his shop has closed?  The film’s main charm is Turturro and Allen together.

 

Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans

     In 1927 F. W. Murnau, the German director best known for Nosferatu, was invited to Hollywood by William Fox where he made this melodrama.  The film was in several ways innovative.  Made just prior to the sound era, it used the Movietone sound-on-film process to include a sound track and a few other sounds.  (One hears at one point Gounod's composition Funeral March of a Marionette, later adopted by the Alfred Hitchcock television show.)  Intertitles are sparingly used, and the camera work is striking, with long tracking shots and creative use of superimposed images.  The sets are fanciful and the film is worth watching to see the dizzying city and the amusement park scenes.  Oddly, Murnau seems to have thought himself still in Europe: the unnamed couple at the center of the story have a home with a thatched roof and, at one point, an orchestra conductor tells his musicians to play “a peasant dance” whereupon the man and his wife proceed to do what looks like a mélange of Central European and Russian moves.  Sunrise reminds the twenty-first century viewer of the days when cinema was young and often more cinematic and  more purely visual than it is today. 


Bedtime Story

     A 1941 comedy directed by Alexnder Hall, a productive contract director for Columbia for years, Bedtime Story features Fredric March as a zany playwright who schemes to keep his wife , played by an elegant Loretta Young, while refusing to leave the theater.  It is a well-done if fairly routine piece of work.  A highlight for me was Robert Benchley’s performance as a sort of pal and casting director for March’s character, though Helen Westley (who had in fact been an outstanding actor, active in  the Washington Square Players and the Theatre Guild) was also quite amusing.  The mad accumulating scene toward the end in which March’s rival’s apartment is filled with crowds of people, among them servers, repair and exterminating service workers, and drunken conventioneers.  When the security staff shows up, the place erupts in a free-for-all.  I was reminded of the stateroom sequence in the Marx Brothers’ A Night at the Opera, which had been released six years earlier. 

 

Scarlet Street

     Fritz Lang’s 1945 film had a similar plot and starred the same actors as his 1944 The Woman in the Window: Edward G. Robinson, Joan Bennett, and Dan Duryea.  The story, about a mousey cashier who is enthralled by a hard-hearted woman, recalls as well The Blue Angel and Of Human Bondage.  There are several convention-bending twists at the end that might surprise a first-time viewer, and the conclusion is so bleak with the murderer never apprehended to boot – that the film was banned in Milwaukee, Atlanta, and New York State.  Duryea, like Richard Widmark, exceled at playing lowlifes, and he is thoroughly despicable here, while Joan Bennett underplays for the most part, and Robinson is so very passive as to almost lose the viewer’s interest.  Curious canvases representing his character’s Sunday paintings present an odd notion of what might have intrigued the art world at the time.  They had been made by Hollywood artist John Decker, whose other works include representations of W. C. Fields as Queen Victoria and Blue Boy with the face of Harpo Marx.

 

Human Desire

     Fritz Lang’s Human Desire (1954) is certainly watchable, if only for Gloria Grahame’s wounded, pouty  performance as Vicki Buckley.  The theatrical poster declared, in lettering larger than the film’s title “She was born to be bad . . . to be kissed . . . to make trouble.”  And so she does in this version of Zola's novel La Bête humaine.  Glenn Ford’s character Jeff Warren, a recently returned Korean War veteran portrayed as an ordinary worker (he says his dream, apart from his work, is to do a lot of fishing who generally seems a nice guy.  Thus the viewer may be surprised when he more or less readily agrees to knock off her husband, his co-worker.  In Zola’s hands, and in the first two films of the story, the character suffers from hereditary madness and is seized by violent outbursts victimizing women, and the plot made a bit more sense.  There is considerable footage that will engage railroad buffs, but cinephiles would do better to see the Jean Renoir’s 1938 film La Bête Humaine with Jean Gabin. 

 

Goin’ to Town

     Originally titled Now I’m a Lady, a title to which the Hays Office objected, Goin’ to Town (1935) was directed by Alexander Hall but the film’s genius is its star and screenplay writer Mae West.  The jokes were sufficiently suggestive that the censors found plenty in the dialogue and even the songs to complain about.  (Of course, West commented in a late interview with Dick Cavett that she would sometimes include bits she knew would be cut in order to satisfy the moral authorities so they would allow her to retain the lines she really wanted to keep.)  Fans of Mae West will enjoy her sinuous postures and double entendres, as well as several bluesy songs by Sam Fain and Irving Kahal.   She even sings a bit of Saint-Saëns’ Samson and Delilah!  Her dedicated pursuit of an English Earl, for true love yet, and her social climbing may seem a bit dissonant with her usual character, but who cares about the plot?  The original New York Times review found her to be past her prime here, but Goin’ to Town remains thoroughly entertaining with plenty of good one-liners, even if some may be slightly shopworn.

 

Cry of the Hunted

     Critics refer to veteran B-picture director Joseph H. Lewis’s 1953 Cry of the Hunted as a noir, though it is better described as a chase drama.  Not only is it set for the most part in Louisiana bayous which hold menaces far different from those of urban back alleys -- alligators, disease-inducing water, and even a pit of deadly quicksand – but its criminal is a sweet guy (though his wife is less principled).  Virtuoso actor Vittorio Gassman plays a fugitive and Barry Sullivan his pursuer (oddly, not a cop but a prison administrator).  Much recent reception of the film has focused on the homoerotic implications of the two, who are repeatedly generous to each other and end up buddies.  Even when they are grappling, it looks like horseplay.  Sullivan’s  character has a weird dream that the psychoanalytically inclined might view in this light; at any rate, it makes little sense otherwise. 

 

Three Weird Sisters

      This 1948 drama, directed by Daniel Birt, attracted my attention when I saw that Dylan Thomas was a co-screenwriter, a job that he might have regarded as hackwork but which produced an atmospheric film with a surprising storyline.  The sisters, played by Nancy Price, Mary Clare, Mary Merrall, are indeed weird as decayed aristocrats in a Welsh mining village (the setting is surely what suggested Thomas to the producers).  The ladies seem merely superannuated vestiges of the past until their sense of honorable noblesse oblige leads them to try to murder their brother in a town in which they command such respect that no one will believe them capable of such villainy until their third or fourth attempt.  This was Birt’s first feature and the final appearance of a still-young veteran of two Hitchcock films with a redoubtable name, Nova Pilbeam.

 

The Trouble with Harry

     This Hitchcock rarity, a true comedy, indicates that the master was wise when he returned to thrillers, yet this film is not without its appeal.  A consistent tension is here, with  the contrast between the oh-so-ordinary, here signified by a small Vermont village, and its residents, who turn out to be rather surprising once one gets acquainted.  For one thing, they all are very blasé about the appearance of a corpse and little concerned about informing the authorities, though each might be implicated in the man’s death.  Shirley MacLaine in her film debut is especially entertaining with her light insouciance, though Edmund Gwenn (who had played Kris Kringle in Miracle on 34th Street) also excels in keeping it frothy and just slightly absurd as the retired captain.  However, the spirits prove a bit thin in the end, and the humor is insufficient to maintain the story’s length.  Nonetheless, the difficulties are all resolved and there are, not one, but two, marriages in view at the end.  (Do not miss the Saul Steinberg drawing with the opening credits.)

 

Lonelyhearts

      Vincent J. Donehue’s 1958 Lonelyhearts, based on Nathanael Wests’ Miss Lonelyhearts, starred  Montgomery Clift, Robert Ryan and Myrna Loy.  A principal pleasure of the film is watching Montgomery Clift’s discomfiture at life.  Though at first he feels too much empathy for his correspondents, an unfortunate encounter leads him to a more despairing cynicism, and through it all he grimaces and looks pained.  All the Angst of the 1950s teenage youth earlier defined by Marlon Brando and James Dean is here painfully reiterated.  Like Johnny in The Wild One and Jim Stark in Robel Without a Cause, Clift’s Adam White feels the pain  of not fitting in.  Robert Ryan is chilling as the cool, utterly amoral manipulative boss who sets out to destroy the young writer’s illusions (but who seem to soften at the very end).

 

 

 


Friday, November 1, 2013

Hell’s House



Last night I watched a 1932 B movie directed by Howard Higgin called Hell’s House, notable primarily for early performances by Bette Davis and Pat O’Brien. When it was first released, the New York Times’ Mordaunt Hall found it “hardly adult” despite a few “moderately interesting interludes.” Its very ordinariness, though, is central to its popular character. In spite of what might seem to some elitist, intellectual, and counter-cultural tendencies (I don’t care to watch most contemporary popular films), my pleasure in watching such a narrative doubtless derives from the same source as its original broad audience. The specific “popular” character of such works may thus transcend the decades in the same way that today’s mass market movies leap across seas both physical and cultural to claim the international audiences that American films have enjoyed since Hollywood’s founding.

In its themes popular art undeniably tends to reinforce attitudes which are socially normative, the sort their critics might call idées reçues. On the other hand “high art,” especially since the Romantic Movement, has sought especially to suggest problems, contradictions, and tensions in established ideas, if not to challenge or replace them altogether. Every work may be located somewhere along this continuum.

Hell’s House, like many popular works, is lavish with sentiment, melodrama, and shocking horror. At the outset our young hero Jimmy’s mother dies in his arms; the reformatory where he finds himself practices harsh discipline that borders on the absurd. Boys work like slaves in a brickyard are subjected to such punishments as standing toes to a line staring at a point on the wall and being sent to solitary confinement so neglectful it can be lethal. Once the hapless Jimmy’s own suffering is relieved (in a typical happy ending), the film-maker inserts then a recollection of the deceased Shorty to allow a wallow of emotion and send viewers out of the theater with a tear in the eye.

But such recreational indulgence in excessive pity and fear cannot itself explain my affection for Hell’s House and the success, not just of American films worldwide, but also of such different genres as Bollywood musical productions and Hong Kong martial arts films, suggests that their appeal is not exclusively thematic, though they do comfort the consumer by reaffirming his community’s specific preexisting attitudes. There is in addition a formal, structural delight in seeing oppositions raised and then dissolved that more resembles the patterning of a musical piece than it does other sorts of less predictable stories.
As the movie is presently little-remembered by either critics or cultists, it is doubtless necessary to explain the plot. I hope the parallels with a thousand other works will suggest themselves.

The film opens with an idyll of country life. Jimmy appears as consistently virtuous and naïve, a model of filial piety despite what the viewer imagines to be his wholesome and active boy-life. Suddenly, without reason or warning, the calamity of his mother’s death strikes. Dissolved in tears, he cradles her lifeless body.

The specter of mortality itself is here multiplied by the distress of the boy, the more shocking since it was caused by a callous hit-and-run driver. Yet, in the film, this problem is rapidly resolved. Jimmy travels to the city where a kindly Uncle Henry and aunt Emma Clark take him in. Lingering mourning, a unqualified or uninterested relative, a host of possible complications are all ignored to introduce the next opposition: honesty and dishonesty.

It seems a certain Matt Kelly (played by Pat O’Brien) boards with the Clarks. A boastful but amiable fellow, he claims to have high-level connections, though in fact he is a low-level bootlegger. Bette Davis plays his girlfriend Peggy Gardner, a character who consorts with petty crooks, yet seems altogether decent herself, if a bit street-smart.

Impressed by Kelly’s blather and exceedingly naïve, Jimmy becomes entangled in his business and gets arrested and sent to a reformatory while the real criminal remains free. Here the story’s central theme is established: an exposé of the juvenile justice system. The time-serving superintendent of the institution is not so much vicious as opportunistic. He would like to have the resources to run the place responsibly, but, failing that, he conceals its cruelty, presumably protecting the politicians who gave him his position. He acts as though he will assist campaigning newspaperman Frank Gebhardt, but conceals his institution’s failings. Despite its reformist theme, Hell’s House fails to evoke even a hint of the drama and pathos of Ford’s Grapes of Wrath or even Mervyn LeRoy’s I Am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang.

In the reform school, Jimmy meets his bunkmate, Shorty, who is not only small of stature but has a bad heart. At their first encounter, Shorty proactively knocks him down, suggesting the place’s pervasive brutality, but they soon become friends. Taking a rap for Jimmy, Shorty ends up in an isolation cell where his illness becomes critical. Desperate to assist him, Jimmy finds a way to escape and enlists Peggy’s help. They contact the crusading writer who is able gather from Jimmy the facts he needs to enlighten the public about the school’s shortcomings. Matt is pressured by his concerned girlfriend to confess his own role, exonerating Jimmy, but it too late for Shorty who dies, alone and ignored. The senseless death of Jimmy’s mother at the hands of an irresponsible driver is echoed in a nice unifying touch by Shorty’s death in a society that shirks responsibility for its “delinquent” youth.

Just as Jimmy’s orphan status was relieved by the generosity of his kindly uncle and aunt, Matt Kelly’s criminal habits are erased. Due to beneficent female influence, he is willing to abandon his lying and bootlegging, do his time, and presumably return to society prepared to marry Peggy and live as an upright citizen. It seems the newspaper’s coverage will be sufficient to produce more humane and effective juvenile facilities, and all is well in the world again, as in the opening rural idyll. Mortality itself, individual immorality, and social injustice are all resolved, though the closing scene milks poor Shorty’s memory for just a bit more pathos.

Like one of Dickens’ individual philanthropists saving a suffering poor boy from the dog-eat-dog lower depths, Gebhardt’s intervention magically settles the social question. This maneuver is no more convincing on the realistic level than the swift replacement of Jimmy’s mother or Matt’s moral awakening, but it doesn’t matter. Even on the thematic level, such stories are a sort of sympathetic magic. By such “happy endings” popular culture reassures its audience that all is well, that life is livable, people may stray but are all right in the end, and society is in fact operating smoothly -- any problems require nothing more than the spotlight of publicity.

Even apart, though, from the satisfaction derived from such exemplary unknotting of contradictions, there is surely an abstract pleasure in the pattern of thesis, antithesis, synthesis that goes beyond specific cultural data. This is one reason that widely divergent audiences in different lands who share few values may enjoy the same stories, and a critic who believes little of the moral, psychological, or social implications such a film presents about lived experience can still watch an inconsequential film with satisfaction. Such a narrative generates complacency beyond any ideology, reassuring the viewer that, despite difficulties and even traumas, all will come right in the end.