Search This Blog



Planetary Motions
, published by Giant Steps Press, is now available on Amazon for $14.95. The Giant Steps website is https://giantstepspress.com/.



Spoor of Desire: Selected Poems
is available for $16.00 from FootHills Publishing, P.O. Box 68, Kanona NY 14856 or see www.foothillspublishing.com.

Tourist Snapshots was available from Randy Fingland's CC Marimbo, P.O. Box 933, Berkeley CA. CC Marimbo has, unfortunately ceased publishing, though I still have a few copies to spare.

Dada Poetry: An Introduction was published by Nirala Publications. It may be ordered on Amazon.com for $29.99 plus shipping. American buyers may order a copy from me for $23 including shipping.

Each book is available from the author William Seaton.


A categorized index of all work that has appeared on this site is available by looking under the current month in the Blog Archive section and selecting Index.


This site is listed in BlogCatalog and

Literature Blogs
Literature blog








Showing posts with label Wordsworth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wordsworth. Show all posts

Friday, March 1, 2024

Every Reader's Coleridge

      This is the eighteenth in a series of essays meant to introduce (or re-introduce) non-scholarly readers to the work of important poets. Consult the Index for the current month under Blog Archive on the right.  An introduction called “Why Read Poetry?” is available at http://williamseaton.blogspot.com/2018/05/why-read-poetry.html

     In this series I limit my focus to the discussion, often including a close paraphrase, of only three or four of each writer’s best-known works while providing a bit of context and biography, eschewing most byways and all footnotes. The poems discussed are all readily available on the internet. 

 

      Samuel Taylor Coleridge is known to most readers through a few poems so widely anthologized and reprinted in textbooks that students often encounter them in classrooms.   Then, too, he has a reputation both as a poetic innovator, the founder with Wordsworth of the theory and practice of English Romanticism, and as a drug addict.  Lyrical Ballads, the ground-breaking book that proclaimed the new style in 1798 included poems by both writers.  In the introduction Wordsworth, the nature poet who was said by his friend De Quincey to be addicted not to drugs or alcohol but to hiking, declared his aim “to make the incidents of common life interesting by tracing in them, truly though not ostentatiously, the primary laws of our nature.”  They agreed that Coleridge would adopt the complementary technique: to write about the supernatural “yet so as to transfer from our inward nature a human interest and a semblance of truth sufficient to procure for these shadows of imagination that willing suspension of disbelief [the first use of this term] for the moment, which constitutes poetic faith.”  Wordsworth meant to defamiliarize commonplace experience by seeing deeply into it, while Coleridge would indicate the symbolic relevance of the exotic and extraordinary.

     Times may have changed, but in my day at least, it was all but impossible to avoid getting “The Rime of the Ancyent Marinere” in school.  Its emphatic, if somewhat muddy, moral theme and its archaizing trappings (including the spelling of the title and the marginal notes) made it popular among pedagogues and its narrative ballad-like stanzas seemed more approachable than odes.  Folksong, which had been dismissed as sub-literary, was embraced by the Romantics such as Bishop Percy and Robert Burns in Britain and  Achim von Arnim and Clemens Brentano in Germany.  The form particularly suited Coleridge’s project because the supernatural often plays a role in English ballads, though his own story is recognizably in the "gathic" style of the late eighteenth century and has little in common with the Middle Ages. 

     This passage includes perhaps the poem’s most well-known lines (“Water, water, every where,/ Nor any drop to drink”) before indulging in horror movie scares in which “slimy things” dance about in lurid special effects.

 

Day after day, day after day,

We stuck, nor breath nor motion;

As idle as a painted ship

Upon a painted ocean.

 

Water, water, every where,

And all the boards did shrink;

Water, water, every where,

Nor any drop to drink.

 

The very deep did rot: O Christ!

That ever this should be!

Yea, slimy things did crawl with legs

Upon the slimy sea.

 

About, about, in reel and rout

The death-fires danced at night;

The water, like a witch's oils,

Burnt green, and blue and white. (115-130)

 

The poem invokes a kind of Calvinist divine judgement in which the mariner is punished for his violence against the albatross, though, of course, the crew also perishes in collateral damage, while the protagonist goes on to work out his cursed destiny rather like the Wandering Jew.  The moral, when it arrives, seems facile:

 

He prayeth best, who loveth best

All things both great and small;

For the dear God who loveth us,

He made and loveth all.

                                    (614-617)

 

     A careful reader is likely to find this an inadequate theme.  Surely the story suggests not only a deep love for the entire creation, hence pacifism and vegetarianism and true Christian nonresistance, but also the unknown impact of casual choices, a sort of tragic fate or ἀνάγκη..  When the mariner shoots the albatross, no motive is given.  The act is as gratuitous as Meursault’s  killing in The Stranger, yet, once done, it determines his entire destiny.  There is as much of the absurd as there is of retributive justice in the story.

     In fact the supernatural element, not the theme, is the heart of the poem’s appeal.  The “special effects” quoted above are expanded to cover a prolonged agony in which the crews’ souls go whizzing by as they die one by one, apparently having become mere aspects of the mariner’s punishment.  (The image reminds me of the skeleton sent over the heads of his audiences for showings of House on Haunted Hill [1959]).  Yet in spite of the mariner’s repentance, he must ever wander on, cautioning others to have compassion.  Very like William Castle’s modern horror movie, the creepy and mysterious thrills are the principal point. 

     The supernatural is replaced by the fabulous and exotic in “Kubla Khan,” all the more fascinating when the author notes that its origin was “a sort of Reverie brought on, by two grains of Opium.”  Here Kubla Khan’s “pleasure-dome” is not just a luxury resort with its gardens and “many an incense-bearing tree”; it is at the same time “a savage place,” “haunted” and “filled with wails,” where tumultuous movements of the earth occur.  He hears then the melody of the “Abyssinian maid” whose song, if he could but remember, would allow him to “build that dome in air,/ That sunny dome! those caves of ice!”  Yet the music is not purely pleasurable; the sublime insights of art are menacing as well, even those from the most profound source.  The fruits of divine inspiration here seem dangerous, wrought about with magical protective ritual (“Weave a circle round him thrice”).  Yet, just as in  the “The Rime of the Ancyent Marinere,” the primary significance is not in theme at all, but rather in the creation of a tone, a mood of dramatic portent, and the writer’s providing a strange and marvelous setting, a second-hand account of an obscure passage brought to life in a drug dream.  The “person from Porlock” who interrupts his reverie is in fact oneself, the reader, for whom the poem was set down, the spectator who may experience the weird at second-hand.  Again, the poem’s primary appeal is like that of science fiction or fantasy, the appeal of the strange.

     Though “Dejection: An Ode” deals with the natural phenomenon of depression, it associates the author’s low spirits with storms and opens with an archaizing, folk prognostication of impending severe weather from a stanza of an old ballad.  In his earlier poem “The Eolian Harp” (1796) the device (a passive musical instrument like wind chimes) had produced “a soft floating witchery of sound” which suggested. to him a magnificent song of the whole creation “Plastic and vast, one intellectual breeze,/ At once the Soul of each, and God of all.”  Here, however, the strains of the harp “better far were mute,” since, like the ominous moon, they presage disaster and thus “better far were mute.” 

     The poem proceeds to specify the sensations of a mind sunk in depression with vivid imagery.

 

          A grief without a pang, void, dark, and drear,

         A stifled, drowsy, unimpassioned grief,

         Which finds no natural outlet, no relief,

                In word, or sigh, or tear—    (21-24)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

                My genial spirits fail;

                And what can these avail

To lift the smothering weight from off my breast?

                                          (39-41)

 Coleridge is very much the modern neurotic, a member of the “poor loveless ever-anxious crowd.” (52) Though he gazes at nature, it is with “how blank an eye” (30) and his mood is unrelieved.  He can only “see, not feel” (38) the charms of the creation.  He come then to realize that he “may not hope from outward forms to win/ The passion and the life, whose fountains are within.” (45-46)  The appreciation of the world is a reciprocal affair, “we receive but what we give,” (47)  In the end

 

from the soul itself must issue forth

A light, a glory, a fair luminous cloud

           Enveloping the Earth—

                                        (53-55)

  

To regain access to the divine “Joy” love provides a route.  “This light, this glory, this fair luminous mist,/

     This beautiful and beauty-making power” (62-63) arrives with a spiritual “wedding” (68).

 

 

  We in ourselves rejoice!

And thence flows all that charms or ear or sight,

      All melodies the echoes of that voice,

All colours a suffusion from that light.

                                        (72-75)

 

 The poet finds refuge in love from the “viper thoughts, that coil around my mind/ Reality's dark dream!” (94-5), though these may arise from real conditions, the “groans” of “trampled men, with smarting wounds” that suffer “pain, and shudder with the cold.” (112-113)  He is thus able to conclude with a victorious wish for the high spirits of his beloved; in the warmth of human love he finds melancholy’s remedy.

 

           With light heart may she rise,

           Gay fancy, cheerful eyes,

      Joy lift her spirit, joy attune her voice;

To her may all things live, from pole to pole,

Their life the eddying of her living soul!

      O simple spirit, guided from above,

Dear Lady! friend devoutest of my choice,

Thus mayest thou ever, evermore rejoice.

                                              (132-139)

 

     This conclusion in felicity is often lacking in Coleridge, a man of decidedly depressive tendencies who served an addiction for much if his life.  His somber and intellectual vision is not to everyone’s taste.  Yet Coleridge contributed to the modern style by his objections to neo-Classicism including his insistence that poetry should not stray too far from the ordinary spoken language.  His fondness for the both the quaint and the tumultuous have aged less well.  Much of his work is too philosophical for many sensibilities.  A hostile critic once accused him of over-emotionalism, labeling him a member of "the School of whining and hypochondriacal poets that haunt the Lakes," but his poetic descendants have been only more self-interested and neurotic.   

     What the reader may make of his poetry, Coleridge is undeniably a substantial critic.  Though philosophers may differ on his significance in the history of ideas, in literature his Lectures on ShakespeareBiographica Literaria, and  other criticism offer many influential ideas, not least the concept of the "willing suspension of disbelief" and the distinction between "imagination" and "fancy."  His adaptation of Schelling’s notion of Ineinsbildung for which he devised the ungainly term "esemplastic power" exemplifies at once the somewhat opaque vulnerability of his ratiocination and its accurate reflection of the poetic mind.

     If Coleridge is quite certain to be read in the future for his role in literary history, he is surely no less certain to impress new readers every year, even some who encounter him in classrooms, with his fondness for the strange fey quality he found provided  bit of the sublime, and for his pronounced rhythms that render his work always cadenced even when irregular. 

     The curious may visit Coleridge’s grave in  St. Michael’s Church in London to read the poet’s epitaph.  The verses are at first glance entirely conventional with the request for passers-by to pray for the departed and the author’s own hopes for salvation.

 

Stop, Christian passer-by!—Stop, child of God,

And read with gentle breast. Beneath this sod

A poet lies, or that which once seemed he.

O, lift one thought in prayer for S. T. C.;

That he who many a year with toil of breath

Found death in life, may here find life in death!

Mercy for praise—to be forgiven for fame

He asked, and hoped, through Christ. Do thou the same!

 

     First of all, the reader is likely to be struck by the fact that Coleridge has here adopted the role of the Ancient Mariner, accosting others to awake them to truths more easily avoided.  Here the equivalent of the Mariner’s curse is life-long depression (“death in life”).  He expresses also a radical skepticism over his career and even his identity (“or that which once seemed he”).  The close inquirer will observe that the initials in the fourth line are not used solely for the convenient rhyme they allow.  The three English letters sound very much like the Greek word ἐστηση, “he has stood” and the same sounds echo repeatedly throughout the verses beginning with the first line (“Stop, Christian” and “Stop, child”) and continuing to the end ( “through Christ . . .same”).  The given name and the proximity to death suggest the book of Samuel in which David says (as part of the affecting story of his relationship with Jonathan) “there is but a step between me and death” (1 Samuel 20:3).  Later David laments his beloved friend, saying “How are the mighty fallen!” (II Samuel 1, 23-27).  David’s grief is ameliorated, however, by his Biblical confidence in the order of things, a certainty Coleridge may have desired, but never attained.  And so the poet elaborated his simple expression of desire, not so much for everlasting life as for a purchase on a certain truth, with elaborate flights of thought, sound patterns, word-play, and allusion, as though with art he could lift himself into the sublime.  In his weaknesses perhaps even more than in his strengths Coleridge was a harbinger of our belated age.

Saturday, January 1, 2022

Scandals of the Romantic Poets

 

     This, like my piece on “The Hazardous Lives of the Sonneteers,” is meant to be more semi-journalistic and descriptive than scholarly.  This time, though, I did not suppress the endnotes.

 

      Artists today are often expected to be to some extent counter-cultural, displaying bohemian behavior and radical opinions, but this assumption is largely a recent one in the last two hundred years.  In Great Britain and in Europe, writers associated with the Romantic movement adopted a combative attitude toward their own societies, leading to the use of the term, originally military, avant-garde.  [1]  This general characterization of artists as rebels, often compounded of a mixture of reactionary philistine prejudice and accurate observation, though never encompassing all writers and painters, has been critical in the arts since. 

    In their own day the British Romantic poets were accused of every sort of immorality and, though it has no bearing on the evaluation of their writing, there was a good deal of substance to many of the charges against them. [2]  Many did seek to challenge the received ideas of their day, and these views, along with personal irregularities which may occur among all classes (but are perhaps more highlighted among artists) led to their condemnation by the guardians of propriety.  Drug abuse, irreligious views, and political radicalism, as well as lurid sexual irregularities were all alleged of the writers associated with Coleridge, Wordsworth, Keats, Shelley and Byron.  Without inquiry into why many of the principal poets of the day behaved, at least in youth, in ways that strayed so considerably from the norm, an assemblage of some of the data exploited by their critics looks hardly less sensational than stories from the National Enquirer. 

     In the Romantic era, the non-medical use of psychotropic drugs lacked a good deal of the cultural significance it has since acquired.  Opium and cannabis were not associated with artists; they were not even illegal and were soon to be ubiquitous in the formulation of panaceas.  Then as now, many addicts began with a doctor’s prescription.  Yet semi-recreational use existed as well.  Southey and Coleridge joined in “experiments” at the Pneumatic Institute inhaling nitrous oxide with such prominent scientists as Humphry Davy, Thomas Beddoes, and James Watt. [3]   

     With the conquest of India by Great Britain, opium became widely available and closely followed alcohol as the chief active ingredient of patent medicines.  Though consumed throughout English society, the medicinal preparation called laudanum was popular among the poets to such an extent that a number of books have focused on their use. [4]  Coleridge attributed “Kubla Khan” to an opium dream, and the poet’s lifelong use of the drug and his attempts to control, if not to cease, his consumption are documented in letters and memoirs.  Even more notorious was his friend, the essayist Thomas De Quincy, whose Confessions of an English Opium-Eater was a sensation in 1821.  Shelley took to carrying laudanum on his person to take against anxiety.  Crabbe, Jane Austen’s favorite poet and admired in his day by Byron and Scott, took opium for forty years.  Keats’ use of the drug is certain, but his degree of use is not. 

     Scholars continue to debate to what extent opium use influenced poetry.  Though opium’s effects are primarily soporific, many writers reported psychedelic effects on sensation and imagination, perhaps using the drug to justify flights of fancy and sublimity they would have experienced in any event.  Very like the drug users among the Beats, the Romantics drug use both to an expansion of vision and to a view of the artist as transgressive.  Whereas most earlier writers had striven either to cultivate connections with the power structure in the interests of patronage or, by the eighteenth century, to appeal to a bourgeois readership, this group considered themselves a counter-culture, and the subjective heavens and hells of opiate use doubtless intensified their belief in the primacy of the imagination. 

     Though opium consumption was no crime, admitting to unorthodox religious views not only attracted the strongest social opprobrium but was illegal as well. [5]  Shelley was expelled from Oxford for publishing The Necessity  of Atheism. [6]  He developed a sort of pantheism, claiming that “the universe is God” and arguing that Deism was reasonable and Christianity supported only by emotion.  He must “war against [the Christian god] for the sake of truth.” [7]  Wordsworth in his early work sounds very like a pantheist and Coleridge described him approvingly as “at least” “a semi-atheist,” [8] though both came to defend the Established Church later in life. 

     Coleridge himself had become a free-thinker upon reading Voltaire as a schoolboy, before slowly drifting back through Unitarianism to orthodoxy.   Often labeled an atheist, Byron throughout his life expressed an ambivalence about Christianity.  In his preface to his Vision of Judgement, an encomium praising George III, Southey (who had been in political and religious questions as radical as other Romantics) attacks the “Satanic school” of poets as “men of diseased hearts and depraved imaginations, who, forming a system of opinions to suit their own unhappy course of conduct, have rebelled against the holiest ordinances of human society, and hating that revealed religion which, with all their efforts and bravadoes, they are unable entirely to disbelieve.”  [9]  Conservative forces claimed that Byron’s clubfoot indicated his diabolism. [10]  In his youth Southey had been known as an atheist, though he was always willing to acknowledge “an intelligent first cause.” [11]  To the public the poets’ behavior considered along with such literary projections as Byron’s Manfred and Cain and Shelley’s Prometheus to leave little doubt that the whole group were rebels against heaven. 
     In politics virtually all the Romantics were originally supporters of the French Revolution, a view which made them radicals in their day.  Wordsworth made two trips to revolutionary France where he attended meetings of the Jacobin Club and the National Assembly and composed his “Letter to the Bishop of Llandaff” who had criticized the revolutionary regime.  He rapidly turned conservative in politics as well as religion, by 1818 advocating what he called a “softened feudalism” [12]

     Shelley, on the other hand, maintained a consistently revolutionary view.  His “Song to the Men of England” could hardly be plainer:

 

The seed ye sow, another reaps;

The wealth ye find, another keeps;

The robes ye weave, another wears;

The arms ye forge, another bears.

 

And there is perhaps no more bitter line of political poetry in English literature that the first of Shelley’s “England in 1819” which calls George III “An old, mad, blind, despised, and dying King,”  The poem concludes with a hopeful prospect of a glorious Phantom” which “may burst, to illumine our tempestuous day.”  Indeed Marx’s daughter was proud to claim him as a socialist.  [13] 

     Likewise supporters of France, Coleridge and Southey planned an egalitarian commune in America, to be governed by the principles of "pantisocracy," meaning rule by all and “aspheterism” or the collective ownership of all property.  Unsurprisingly, the project was never far advanced.   The two collaborated on The Fall of Robespierre commenting on the events in France.  In 1796 Coleridge published a short-lived newspaper The Watchman in Bristol which argued for the universal suffrage and the abolition of the slave trade.

     Leigh Hunt, though less read now than his friends Keats and Shelley, was a political influence on the Romantic circle.  In a series of journals beginning with The Examiner he published articles critical of the British government and, in particular, of the Prince Regent, later George IV.  Charles Lamb’s “The Triumph of the Whale” ridiculed the “Prince of Whale’s” corpulence and dissipation.  Hunt’s own piece “The Prince on St. Patrick’s Day” (with epigrams by Lamb) in which the prince is denounced as “a violator of his word, a libertine over head and ears in debt and disgrace, a despiser of domestic ties, the companion of gamblers and demireps, a man who had just closed half a century without one single claim on the gratitude of his country, or the respect of posterity." [14]  This language was sufficient to get Hunt and his brother (the printer) arrested for libel.  Though the Hunts had before been charged with libel, English juries had refused to convict them.  This time, however, the two were found guiltyand sentenced to two years in prison.  Something of a cause célèbre, Hunt took advantage of the corrupt practices of the day to make his accommodations in Surrey County Gaol a comfortable two-room private suite in the infirmary.  There he decorated his living space, concealing the bars behind Venetian blinds, papering the walls with floral prints, painting the ceiling with a cloudy sky, and importing flowers, books, and a piano, as well as comfortable couches.  According to Lamb, “there was no other such room, except in fairy tale.”  Attended by a servant, he there received a stream of visitors including Lamb, Byron and Thomas Moore. [15]  After he had served his term, when he went to Italy at Shelley’s invitation, the motive was in part to publish ta political paper not subject to British censorship. 

     It is a measure of the degree to which ideas of radical reform permeated the poetic scene of the day that even Keats, far less an activist partisan than others, left nevertheless no question of what side he was on in the contradiction between the wealthy and the working class.  His sonnet “Written On The Day That Mr. Leigh Hunt Left Prison” attracted an attack from Blackwood’s Magazine.  Perhaps the best statement of his political views is contained in a long letter from September 1819 in which he laments that the French Revolution stimulated a reaction which “spread a horrid superstition against all inovation and improvement – The present struggle in England of the people is to destroy this superstition. What has rous’d them to do it is their distresses – Perpaps on this account the pres’ent distresses of this nation are a fortunate thing – tho so horrid in the[i]r experience.”  To Keats “This is no contest beetween whig and tory – but between right and wrong.” [16]  The primary thrust of the aggressive ridicule of Keats in the conservative journals was his class origin.  The term “the Cockney school” [17] focused with unashamed class prejudice on the “plebian origins and education” of Keats and others.

     Byron defended the Luddites in the House of Lords where he had associated himself closely with radical reform.  For instance, in a stirring speech in 1812 he declared that Luddite demonstrators dismissed as a mob were in fact nothing but the country’s working people.

 

it is the mob that labour in your fields and in your houses – that man your navy and recruit your army – that have enabled you to defy all the world and can also defy you when neglect and calamity have driven them to despair. You may call the people a mob but not forget that a mob too often speaks the sentiments of the people.   [18]

 

 

Byron wrote for the radical British publication The Liberal and joined a secret society of Italian nationalists, and ultimately, of course, he died in service to what might be called an anti-colonial struggle. 

     While drug use and transgressive religious and political beliefs might offend many Britons, they surely took an even greater interest in the writers’ sexual lives.  Wordsworth had had a child with Annette Vallon in revolutionary France, and others of the Romantics had turbulent personal lives, but the real scandals concerned Shelley and Byron, who were accused of immorality based on behavior that, even today, would be condemned by most. [19] 

     Shelley had said of marriage in Queen Mab of marriage that "a system could not well have been devised more studiously hostile to human happiness.”  Still, he eloped and married Harriet Westbrook, daughter of the owner of a thriving coffee house and schoolmate of his younger sister, in 1811 just after her sixteenth and his nineteenth birthdays.  Though they had two children, they had all but separated by the summer of 1814, when he eloped once more with Mary Godwin, herself sixteen at the time.  Her illegitimate step-sister Claire Clairmont accompanied them to Europe and remained with the ménage becoming Byron’s lover and mother of his child Allegra. 

     The complexities of life among these free-thinkers is suggested by the fact that some biographers think that, while socializing with Godwin’s family, Shelley had also been a lover of Fanny Imlay,  (daughter of Mary Wollstonecraft and an American businessman) in 1814.  She committed suicide two years later as did Harriet Shelley, who was five months pregnant (there is debate about who the father may have been).  Meanwhile, Harriet’s sister Eliza had moved in with the couple and Shelley had conceived a passion (apparently unconsummated) for Elizabeth Hitchener, an unmarried schoolteacher, and suggested that she join the household, sharing all property. [20]  T. J. Hogg, the co-publisher with Shelley of The Necessity of Atheism, flirted with Harriet only -for Shelley to assure him he could not be jealous.  Later, he may well have encouraged Hogg and Mary to sleep together. [21]  During Shelley’s residence abroad, he fathered a child in Naples (falsely claiming when registering the birth that his wife was the mother).  He was involved as well in romantic attachments with Jane Williams, who lived with her lover in the same building as the Shelleys, as well as Sophia Stacey, who was staying at the same pension in Italy, and Teresa (Emilia) Viviani, teen-age daughter of the governor of Pisa and the muse of Epipsychidion.

     If providing even a brief summary of Shelley’s erotic involvements is difficult, to do the same for Lord Byron is impossible.  He was constantly pursuing both men and women.  His gay liaisons began the Trinity College choirboy John Edleston during his college days, and included his servant William Fletcher who attended Byron from 1804 until his death.  When he traveled to Greece, he felt much freer about homoerotic relationships and took numerous lovers including the fourteen-year-old Nicolas Giraud.  He indefatigably pursued his teenaged Greek page, Lukas Chalandritsanos, and, finding him uncooperative, managed to locate many who were more complaisant, reporting to his gay friends in England that he had managed over two hundred "pl and opt Cs,” a code for sexual indulgence derived from the phrase "coitum plenum et optabilem" in Petronius's Satyricon.

     He had as well an extraordinary number of heterosexual affairs, becoming perhaps the leading sex symbol of his time.  Most notoriously, he had an affair for years with his half-sister Augusta Leigh and very likely had a child with her.  In his “Epistle to Augusta” he imagines the joy of “a home with thee” and declares sentimentally, “The tie which bound the first endures the last!”

     In the interest of both cash and respectability he married Annabella Milbanke in 1815, but, following the birth of their daughter Ada the following December, she found his constant philandering (during this period he was linked to actress Charlotte Mardyn and Lady Caroline Lamb among many others) and she concluded that she could not live with him and sued for divorce. 

     The combination of his infamy and his debts caused him to go abroad in April 1816.  Though his reputation for sexual misdeeds was known to all, he was doubtless fleeing exposure for his gay lovers.   He was attacked in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine in an article describing him as diabolical.  “It appears, in short, as if this miserable man, having exhausted every species of sensual gratification, -having drained the cup of sin even to its bitterest dregs, — were resolved to show us that he is no longer a human being even in his frailties, but a cool, unconcerned fiend, laughing with detestable glee over the whole of the better and worse elements of which human life is composed.”  As a result, Byron complains "I was advised not to go to the theatres, lest I should be hissed, nor to my duty in parliament, lest I should be insulted by the way; even on the day of my departure my most intimate friend told me afterwards that he was under apprehension of violence from the people who might be assembled at the door of the carriage." [22]  In Europe he cultivated an affair with a married woman Marianna Segati in whose house he was staying, then with another married woman, Margarita Cogni.  When he broke up with this last lover, she committed suicide.  He turned then to the Countess Teresa Guiccioli with whom he lived for several years.  At the time of his death he was lavishly patronizing a nine-year-old Turkish Muslim girl. 

     So the bill of particulars one wishing to condemn the Romantic poets might compile is varied, lengthy, and, in large part, well-substantiated.  Since then the actions of the poètes maudits, the Lost Generation, denizens of Greenwich Village, and the Beats have likewise been condemned.  Whatever the ethical lapses in the lives of the poets in any age, their behavior can have no relation to the evaluation of their work.  As much as the perceived contrast in beliefs and lifestyles between unconventional artists and those exemplifying the status quo may reveal about the social codes of their times and our own, such data have nothing to do with the reason we remember these men at all: their work.  In the evaluation of art terms such as immorality or blasphemy, sedition or dissipation can carry no weight.

     Yet the partial displacement of the arts from the central power structures of society has made a difference in both themes and styles.  It may be that a lineage of creative types stretching back to archaic semi-psychotic shamans, through wandering Old English scops like Widsith, gypsy goliards, minstrels and showpeople has long tended to act and think in somewhat more independent fashion than the local masters who, for all their wealth, were obliged to accept the assumptions of their time.  The bourgeois may have envied as well as condemned the free-thinker and free-liver, but it was not until the time of the Romantics that it came to be expected that artists often live by different rules than others. 

.

 

 

1.  The term was first used to describe art by was first used in the cultural sphere in 1825 by the Saint Simonian mathematician Olinde Rodrigues in his essay, “L’artiste, le savant et l’industriel.”

2.  Similar claims have been made concerning virtually every avant-garde movement since, often, as in the originating example, with some reason.  The attacks on Keats and Hunt focused more on their supposed “plebeian origin and education” to quote the letter from Z. (John Gibson Lockhart) in Blackwood’s for May 1818 now so8und thoroughly out of date.

3.  Laughing gas remained a subject of interest.  In the late nineteenth century William James and his associates used it in an attempt to experience mystical states.  See lectures XVI and XVIOI of Varieties of Religious Experience (1901).  James had earlier written an anonymous article on “The Anaesthetic Revelation and the Gist of Philosophy” in The Atlantic Monthly as well as an 1898 piece in the Psychological Review on “Consciousness Under Nitrous Oxide.”

4. The classic study is still M. H. Abrams The Milk of Paradise (1971), but see also the earlier Opium and the Romantic Imagination by Alethea Hayter (1968) and Elizabeth Schneider’s Coleridge, Opium, and Kubla Khan (1983).  Nicholas Roe claims in his John Keats: A New Life (2012) that Keats, too, was a regular user. 

5.  Britain’s blasphemy laws were not abolished until 2008 in England and Wales and 2021 in Scotland.  A similar law remains in effect in Northern Ireland.  The last conviction in England in 1977 involved a gay publication so doubtless homophobia played a role in that case.

6.  In  1834 a proposal to allow attendance by Dissenters was defeated in Parliament.  Until 1854 in order to matriculate at Oxford a student needed to subscribe to the Thirty-Nine Articles of Anglican faith.  In Cambridge the requirement lasted two years further and only in 1871 were non-Anglicans allowed to teach in those institutions. 

7.  Letter to Elizabeth Hitchener, June 20, 1822.

8.  Letter from Coleridge to John Thelwall May 13, 1796.

9.  Byron was then inspired to write his own Vision of Judgment in response and in his own preface he aggressively denounces Southey for rushing in “where he had no business” and accusing him of being a traitor to the progressive views he had once held. 

10.  One example is The Dorchester Guide; or, a house that Jack Built (1819), a satirical pamphlet of 1819.  The anonymous publication warns that “the mind is corrupted” by Byron’s “sweet and harmonious” poetry and says his real identity is revealed to those who “look at his feet,” a reference to his club-foot, for proof of his association with the devil.

11.  Letter of Robert Southey to John Prior Estlin, 9 April 1797.

12.  See his “Two Addresses to the Freeholders of Westmoreland.”  He had accepted the patronage of Lord Lonsdale since 1813.

13.  Edward and Eleanor Marx-Aveling, “Shelley and Socialism,” To-Day, April 1888.

14.  The Examiner, 22 March 1812.

15.  See Leigh Hunt, Autobiography.

16.  To George & Georgiana Keats, September 17, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 27, 1819.

17.  The term, referring primarily to Keats, Hunt, and Hazlitt, originated in a series of eight hostile reviews in Blackwood's Magazine in 1817 and 1818.

18.  George Gordon Byron, The Works of Lord Byron including the suppressed poems complete in one volume (Paris, A. and W. Galignani, 1828), p. 555.

19.  While far greater latitude in lifestyle had been accepted through the twentieth century, the last few decades have seen a renewed wave of condemnation of certain artists and politicians on the basis of what is deemed by their critics unacceptable sexual behavior.

20.  Bieri, James (2008). Percy Bysshe Shelley: a biography. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 170, 193–5

21.  Richard Holmes, Shelley, the Pursuit (London:1974), pp. 391, 594, 678.

22.  “Some Observations upon an Article in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine,”  Blackwood’s, August 1819.  The response was unpublished until John Murray’s 1833 edition of The Works of Lord Byron.

 

Friday, October 1, 2021

Every Reader's Wordsworth

 

      This is the fifteenth of a series of essays meant to introduce (or re-introduce) non-scholarly readers to the work of important poets. In this series I limit my focus to the discussion, often including a close paraphrase, of only three or four of each writer’s best-known works while providing a bit of context and biography, eschewing most byways and all footnotes.  The general introduction to the series titled “Why Read Poetry?” is also available on this site.

     Wordsworth’s poetry is readily available on line, but I have included the short lyrics and appended the longer “Tintern Abbey” and “Intimations of Immortality.”

 

 

     After altering the face of poetry with his collaborator Coleridge in Lyrical Ballads and writing poems that English-speaking students continue to find in their textbooks, Wordsworth continued writing for sixty years, producing a quantity of verse rarely read today.  At the age of twenty-four he was a youthful radical (in politics as well as poetry, though not in religion) who declared in a letter, “I am of that odious class of men called democrats, and of that class I shall forever continue,” yet he later subsided into such respectability that he was ultimately named Poet Laureate (after Southey’s thirty-year reign), a post he accepted only after assurances that nothing would be required of him.   He was by then a solid Tory, opposing, for instance, civil rights for Catholics, and objecting to industrialization as a reactionary who imagined an earlier harmonious pre-capitalist agricultural era governed by an unerring national church and benevolent barons.  Browning lamented his defection in “The Lost Leader” writing “Just for a handful of silver he left us/ Just for a riband to stick in his coat.”

     Yet his earlier work not only transformed English poetry, it provided a sort of manifesto with a program for innovation in the preface to Lyrical Ballads.  There he declares his rejection of what had become the standard figures of poetic ornament including conventional “poetic diction” such as “personifications of abstract ideas” and all cliches, “in themselves proper and beautiful, but which have been foolishly repeated by bad Poets.”  He means to substitute a fresh take on what he observes, saying “I have at all times endeavoured to look steadily at my subject” and “to adopt the very language of men.”  In contrast to the cerebral pleasures of neo-Classical verse, Wordsworth declares that “the end of Poetry is to produce excitement in co-existence with an overbalance of pleasure.”  His description of the process for distilling experience into art is the most often quoted line in the essay: “I have said that Poetry is the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings: it takes its origin from emotion recollected in tranquillity.”

     He thereby exposed himself to critics who, accusing him of being prosaic and raised an “outcry against the triviality and meanness both of thought and language” in his work.  It is a measure of Wordsworth’s success that the difficulty now in reading these poems is not their use of unpoetic language, but rather that what had once been so unfamiliar has come to exemplify a poet’s voice that what had once been jarringly fresh now seems in its turn trite. 

     Wordsworth’s poem “I wandered lonely as a cloud,” perhaps the most reprinted of all his works, provides an excellent example not only of the decay of material at one time fresh and exciting but which now seems hackneyed due to the success of the Romantic revolution.  This lyric also illustrates Wordsworth’s notion of how the poetic process grows from raw experience through reflection. 

  

I wandered lonely as a cloud,

That floats on high o'er vales and hills,

When all at once I saw a crowd,

A host, of golden daffodils;

Beside the lake, beneath the trees,

Fluttering and dancing in the breeze.

 

Continuous as the stars that shine

And twinkle on the milky way,

They stretched in never-ending line

Along the margin of a bay:

Ten thousand saw I at a glance,

Tossing their heads in sprightly dance.

 

The waves beside them danced; but they

Out-did the sparkling waves in glee:

A poet could not but be gay,

In such a jocund company:

I gazed—and gazed—but little thought

What wealth the show to me had brought:

 

For oft, when on my couch I lie

In vacant or in pensive mood,

They flash upon that inward eye

Which is the bliss of solitude;

And then my heart with pleasure fills,

And dances with the daffodils.

 

      The speaker begins as an isolated observing eye, “lonely” and aimless, yet as much a part of the scene as a cloud.  He is suddenly struck by the vision of bright flowers which seem to dance and exult in their own existence.  The glimpse of the beautiful order they represent is then linked to the cosmos by likening them to the stars.  They seem not just beautiful, but “sprightly” and “jocund,” making the poet “gay” in sympathy.  He then recalls the scene later at leisure and the flush of glad emotion returns, a feeling he hopes to approximate in the reader who has sympathetically followed his experience as well.  He calls contemplation “that inward eye/ Which is the bliss of solitude,” as it allows him to recapture his joy, though, of course, some have found only depression “in vacant or in pensive mood.”  For Wordsworth people are good, the world is good, and the daffodils merely a readily accessible entry to that realization.  

     When Lyrical Ballads was already being prepared for printing, Wordsworth and his sister Dorothy did a walking tour of a portion of the border between England and Scotland after which he wrote a long poem “Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey” with which he was so pleased he included it in the forthcoming volume.  (The text is appended following endnotes.)  This contemplative piece, sometimes called a “conversation poem” as it uses informal language to address a silent listener, has affinities as well to the ode as understood at the time with a three-part division and its lofty and exalted mood.  In it Wordsworth describes the progress of his soul toward sublime beauty and truth through his love of natural scenery and of his sister Dorothy. 

      Organized not in stanzas but in verse paragraphs, the first emphasizes the wild character of the neighborhood with the abbey’s ruins.  In spite of the fact that the Wye valley already in Wordsworth’s day has coal pits and ironworks, for the poet all is natural or very nearly so.  Thus the cultivated orchards “lose themselves/ ‘Mid groves and copses,” and the hedge-rows are “hardly hedge-rows.”  Even the smoke of cottages strikes him as though it might be due to incidental intruders like himself, vagrants or hermits.    

     He enjoys the contemplation of nature, but returns home to savor his memories even more deeply. 

  

But oft, in lonely rooms, and 'mid the din

Of towns and cities, I have owed to them,

In hours of weariness, sensations sweet,

Felt in the blood, and felt along the heart;

And passing even into my purer mind

With tranquil restoration:—

                                                            (26-31)

 

 Apart from recalling the past pleasures he has experienced, the poet feels such rumination is morally beneficial, encouraging “little, nameless, unremembered acts/ Of kindness and of love.” (35-36)  Most sublime, however, is a sort of mystic philosophic insight. 

 

another gift,      

Of aspect more sublime; that blessed mood,       

In which the burthen of the mystery,      

In which the heavy and the weary weight              40

Of all this unintelligible world     

Is lighten'd:—that serene and blessed mood,      

In which the affections gently lead us on,             

Until, the breath of this corporeal frame,             

And even the motion of our human blood            

Almost suspended, we are laid asleep    

In body, and become a living soul:           

While with an eye made quiet by the power        

Of harmony, and the deep power of joy,

We see into the life of things.

                                                         (37-50)

 

     Wordsworth traces the progress of his own appreciation of nature which sprang from a purely sensual joy with its “aching joys” (82) and “dizzy raptures” (83) which now seems “thoughtless” (91).  Upon mature reflection he can discern “the still, sad music of humanity” (93) in what had been simply “an appetite: a feeling and a love” (81).  Though later fiercely loyal to the Church of England, he here approaches pantheism, seeing in natural beauty a “presence” (95) “that rolls through all things” (103).  His mysticism falls short of the certainties of rapture, however. He is beset by “somewhat of a sad perplexity” (61) and must qualify his enthusiasm with such phrases as “if this/ Be but a vain belief,” (51-2).  In spite of the recognition that the senses “half-create” (107) our impressions, he is certain that nature provides

  

The anchor of my purest thoughts, the nurse,     

The guide, the guardian of my heart, and soul    

Of all my moral being.                           (110-112)

 The poem concludes with a tribute to the poet’s sister Dorothy, a significant contributor to his work, in whom as well as in the hills and valleys he can see the glory of nature.  The tone turns then elegiac as he imagines his own death after which he hopes that his memory may provide a service for her soul similar to her presence now for him. 


                                 [with] healing thoughts              

Of tender joy wilt thou remember me,   

And these my exhortations!

                                                             (145-147)

 

     Like the brief daffodil lyric “Tintern Abbey” demonstrates the role of poetry in producing “the bliss of solitude” as the appreciation of natural and artistic beauty alike generates a feeling of the sublime.  This was no abstract conviction but for Wordsworth a daily reality.  His friend Thomas DeQuincey who, as a user of opium knew what addiction was, declared that Wordsworth hiked about with a compulsion that resembled the alcoholic’s thirst.      

     Wordsworth continued pursuing the sublime afflatus he considered essential to the highest poetry, but which he also required for peace of mind.  In his great “Ode,” subtitled “Intimations of Immortality from Recollections of Early Childhood,” he provoked criticism with his Romantic revaluation of childhood.  Instead of considering children as imperfect adults, slowly perfecting the skills and gathering the experience that bring wisdom, Wordsworth maintains that they are at first “apparell'd in celestial light.” (4)  Having lost “the glory and the freshness of a dream,” he laments that “the things which I have seen I now can see no more.” (9)  Though the poet may recapture sparks of the old numinous glory, he feels that “there hath pass'd away a glory from the earth.” (18)

     While the poet can infer a grand cosmic affirmation in the birds’ “joyous song” and the prancing of lambs (19-20), he is himself struck by a thought of grief due to the uniquely adult human quality of self-doubt and then rescued by “a timely utterance” (22-23).   Though the signs he describes are of the natural world, it is significant that his release from anxiety is enabled not by a sight, but by an utterance, surely the same remedy he had earlier found, not the natural world alone (which would have been sufficient in childhood) but in poetic contemplation.  While the Shepherd-Boy (36) is intuitively in harmony with the “jollity” at the symbolic “heart of May,” (31-32), the conviction that “all the earth is gay,” (29) the poet, though uplifted by the natural scene, yet feels a painful loss, a gap between his sometimes “sullen” (43) mood and the “fulness” of the “bliss” (42) of the “blessèd creatures” (37) around him.  He plaintively asks,

 

            Whither is fled the visionary gleam?       

Where is it now, the glory and the dream?

                                                                      (57-58)

  

     Though the child comes with a sort of perfect intuitive wisdom from God (66) into this imperfect world, the loss of vision begins immediately and progresses into maturity.  With wonderful memorable phrases Wordsworth maintains that we begin “not in entire forgetfulness” (63) but “trailing clouds of glory” (65).  “Our birth is but a sleep and a forgetting” (59) as “the prison-house” (68) of ordinary fallen consciousness forms about the youth until the grown “Man” perceives that his original inspired vision has died away.  (76)

     One could scarcely challenge rationalist neo-Classical attitudes more directly than by this claim of infant enlightenment.  Just as the Romantic sensibility celebrates uncultivated landscapes, it privileges the uneducated, the child, the poor, the primitive over observers whose very sophistication has caused them to lose sight of the most important realities.  This reversal of values is familiar today in, for instance, the assumption that oral cultures such as pre-Columbian Native Americans possess knowledge lost to mainstream culture. 

    For Wordsworth the adult is an “Inmate” (83) who, distracted by earthly pleasures, has forgotten “that imperial palace whence he came.” (85)  From “new-born blisses” (86) an individual turns to the business of life; the “little actor” (103) learns a role by “endless imitation,” (108) while losing touch with his or her own original nature. 

     The poet erupts then in excited praise for the young child who for him is “the best philosopher,” (111) still in touch with “the eternal mind,” (114) a “mighty prophet,” and a “seer blest.” (115)  He finds it ironic that the young are typically eager to grow up, to accept “the inevitable yoke” (129) at the cost of “blessedness.” (130)  As a consequence they find themselves “toiling” (117) their entire lives to recover that divine light. 

     At this juncture, for the first time, Wordsworth points to the basis of his anxiety: mortality.  For the child he claims “Immortality” (119) is constantly present, unquestioned, giving a sense “of heaven-born freedom” (127) while his elders are “in darkness lost, the darkness of the grave.” (118)  He gains “benediction” (139) by recalling his childhood though he claims that it is not “delight and liberty” (141) or “new-fledged hope still fluttering in his breast” (143) that that he recalls which is most important to him, but rather a certain elusive but powerful mysterium tremendum.  

  

those obstinate questionings      

    Of sense and outward things, 

    Fallings from us, vanishings;    

    Blank misgivings of a Creature              

Moving about in worlds not realized,                         

High instincts before which our mortal Nature    

Did tremble like a guilty thing surprised

(146-152)

 

 In this sense of “the eternal Silence (160), he finds the “fountain-light of all our day,” the “master-light of all our seeing.” (156-157)  The memory of that revelatory insight enables vision in maturity.

 

Our souls have sight of that immortal sea            

        Which brought us hither,     

    Can in a moment travel thither,                        

And see the children sport upon the shore,         

And hear the mighty waters rolling evermore.    

                                                                           (168-172)

 

     With this lovely image the poet becomes elated, crying “Then sing, ye birds, sing, sing a joyous song!” (173)  As he cannot entirely recapture the “splendour in the grass,” or “glory in the flower,” (183), he must make do with “strength in what remains behind” (185) through cultivation of “the philosophic mind” that “looks through death.” (190-191)  Though he has “relinquish'd” the “delight” the child experiences, it has been replaced with the “more habitual” (196-197) if “sober” (202) view that acknowledges mortality. (203)  While his vision is chastened by experience, nature remains the portal through which he may re-experience the transports of his childhood.  "To me the meanest flower that blows can give/ Thoughts that do often lie too deep for tears." (207- 208)

     Though the poet maintains that a philosophic acceptance has replaced the unthinking ecstasy he attributes to children, this adult vision seems both mysterious and emotionally darker.   Neither the quasi-pantheism some of his early work implies or the orthodox Anglicanism he came to defend would wholly answer his timor mortis.  He remains troubled as he must get by on hints, half-remembered sensations, “intimations.”  Not only the “joys,” but also the “fears” (206) of the human heart inform his perspective. 

     Death is also the problem in Wordsworth’s five “Lucy” poems in which a beloved, variously identified with a lover, perhaps Mary Hutchinson, with his sister Dorothy, or with the poet’s inspiration.   These lyrics, written in simple language and using ballad meter, seek to reconcile in simpler terms the coexistence of death of love and beauty.

  

Strange Fits of Passion Have I Known

 

 

Strange fits of passion have I known:

And I will dare to tell,

But in the lover’s ear alone,

What once to me befell.

 

When she I loved looked every day

Fresh as a rose in June,

I to her cottage bent my way,

Beneath an evening-moon.

 

Upon the moon I fixed my eye,

All over the wide lea;

With quickening pace my horse drew nigh

Those paths so dear to me.

 

And now we reached the orchard-plot;

And, as we climbed the hill,

The sinking moon to Lucy’s cot

Came near, and nearer still.

 

In one of those sweet dreams I slept,

Kind Nature’s gentlest boon!

And all the while my eye I kept

On the descending moon.

 

My horse moved on; hoof after hoof

He raised, and never stopped:

When down behind the cottage roof,

At once, the bright moon dropped.

 

What fond and wayward thoughts will slide

Into a Lover’s head!

“O mercy!” to myself I cried,

“If Lucy should be dead!”

 

      The poem opens by seizing the reader’s attention with the announcement of the theme as “strange fits of passion” which he will “dare to tell” only to fellow lovers.  It is almost like a supermarket tabloid promising juicy stories inside.  This tease lends an edge to the otherwise commonplace opening scene of the lover traveling one evening to visit his beloved who, he tells us, “looked every day” “fresh as a rose in June.”  As he rides on, the moon is sinking to the horizon behind her cottage.  While observing it, he falls into a waking “sweet” dream.  As the moon with apparent suddenness drops out of sight, he emerges from his reverie with what he calls a “fond and wayward” thought that causes him to cry out “’O mercy! . . .if Lucy should be dead!’”  The identification with the bloom of nature with which he started has altered with the recognition that, just as the moon goes through its cycles, every person, however beloved, must die.  To experience the joys of love, one must make oneself vulnerable to the pain of loss. 

     Yet why is this “strange,” a thought one must “dare” to reveal?  Surely the realization of mortality and the changes brought by time may for some sharpen love.  All the pleasures of this life are seasoned with the knowledge that they are ephemeral.  The point is often made in ancient Greek lyrics and in the words of the preacher who said one should “Live joyfully with the wife whom thou lovest all the days of the life of thy vanity.”  However, for Wordsworth the thought of death is worrisome enough that he tries to trivialize it, calling it first “strange” and then “fond and wayward.”  “Fond” is certainly may be, since it is natural to be anxious about the well-being of loved ones.  The adjective “wayward,” though, implies that the consciousness of mortality is a random and irrelevant thought to the lover.  The poem’s conclusion indicates that it is not, however, easily dismissed.      

     This and the other Lucy poems are among the most anthologized of Wordsworth’s lyrics and probably shape many people’s notion of what poetry is.  While few may glance at even the first of the eight thousand lines of The Prelude, the poet’s spiritual autobiography, a great many have found a measure of truth and beauty in his short poems

     His influence is not limited to people’s remembering his daffodils or his Lucy from school days.  In many significant ways, the Romantic revolution has not ended.  Many moderns assent to Romantic assumptions when they think intuition and emotion more meaningful than ratiocination or consider traditional tribal people to possess insights lost to the civilized world.  Even the preference for wild countryside over tended gardens is a Romantic choice.  High-flown language remains suspect, and much poetry today uses highly colloquial language without fear of a reaction like that of the reviewer of Lyrical Ballads who attacked Wordsworth’s “perverted taste for simplicity.”  Even for many who have not read him at all, Wordsworth and his contemporaries set new standards or taste and ideas that not only persist but have come to be the standard against which newer poets have rebelled.  Aware that his poems were “materially different from those, upon which general approbation is at present bestowed,” Wordsworth asked that his reader “in judging these Poems . . . decide by his own feelings genuinely, and not by reflection upon what will probably be the judgment of others.”  In fact, rather than replacing literary convention with a simple sincerity, a directness that need not be interpretation, he constructed a lasting alternative code, a new form of beauty.

 

 

 

 

Lines Written a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey

On Revisiting the Banks of the Wye during a Tour

July 13, 1798.

 

Five years have past; five summers, with the length         

Of five long winters! and again I hear      

These waters, rolling from their mountain-springs             

With a sweet inland murmur.*—Once again       

Do I behold these steep and lofty cliffs, 

Which on a wild secluded scene impress

Thoughts of more deep seclusion; and connect  

The landscape with the quiet of the sky.

The day is come when I again repose      

Here, under this dark sycamore, and view             10

These plots of cottage-ground, these orchard-tufts,         

Which, at this season, with their unripe fruits,    

Among the woods and copses lose themselves,  

Nor, with their green and simple hue, disturb      

The wild green landscape. Once again I see         

These hedge-rows, hardly hedge-rows, little lines             

Of sportive wood run wild; these pastoral farms,              

Green to the very door; and wreathes of smoke 

Sent up, in silence, from among the trees,           

With some uncertain notice, as might seem,        20

Of vagrant dwellers in the houseless woods,       

Or of some hermit's cave, where by his fire         

The hermit sits alone.

 

                                     Though absent long,             

These forms of beauty have not been to me,      

As is a landscape to a blind man's eye:   

But oft, in lonely rooms, and mid the din              

Of towns and cities, I have owed to them,            

In hours of weariness, sensations sweet,              

Felt in the blood, and felt along the heart,           

And passing even into my purer mind                     30

With tranquil restoration:—feelings too

Of unremembered pleasure; such, perhaps,        

As may have had no trivial influence       

On that best portion of a good man's life;            

His little, nameless, unremembered acts              

Of kindness and of love. Nor less, I trust,              

To them I may have owed another gift, 

Of aspect more sublime; that blessed mood,       

In which the burthen of the mystery,      

In which the heavy and the weary weight              40

Of all this unintelligible world     

Is lighten'd:—that serene and blessed mood,      

In which the affections gently lead us on,             

Until, the breath of this corporeal frame,             

And even the motion of our human blood            

Almost suspended, we are laid asleep    

In body, and become a living soul:           

While with an eye made quiet by the power        

Of harmony, and the deep power of joy,

We see into the life of things.                             50

 

                                                If this              

Be but a vain belief, yet, oh! how oft,     

In darkness, and amid the many shapes 

Of joyless day-light; when the fretful stir              

Unprofitable, and the fever of the world,             

Have hung upon the beatings of my heart,           

How oft, in spirit, have I turned to thee  

O sylvan Wye! Thou wanderer through the wood             

How often has my spirit turned to thee!

 

And now, with gleams of half-extinguish'd though[t,]      

With many recognitions dim and faint,          60

And somewhat of a sad perplexity,          

The picture of the mind revives again:    

While here I stand, not only with the sense         

Of present pleasure, but with pleasing thoughts 

That in this moment there is life and food            

For future years. And so I dare to hope  

Though changed, no doubt, from what I was, when first 

I came among these hills; when like a roe            

I bounded o'er the mountains, by the sides         

Of the deep rivers, and the lonely streams,    70

Wherever nature led; more like a man   

Flying from something that he dreads, than one

Who sought the thing he loved. For nature then

(The coarser pleasures of my boyish days,            

And their glad animal movements all gone by,)   

To me was all in all.—I cannot paint        

What then I was. The sounding cataract

Haunted me like a passion: the tall rock,

The mountain, and the deep and gloomy wood,

Their colours and their forms, were then to me   80

An appetite: a feeling and a love,             

That had no need of a remoter charm,   

By thought supplied, or any interest        

Unborrowed from the eye.—That time is past,   

And all its aching joys are now no more,

And all its dizzy raptures. Not for this      

Faint I, nor mourn nor murmur; other gifts          

Have followed, for such loss, I would believe,      

Abundant recompence. For I have learned           

To look on nature, not as in the hour              90

Of thoughtless youth, but hearing oftentimes     

The still, sad music of humanity,

Nor harsh nor grating, though of ample power   

To chasten and subdue. And I have felt  

A presence that disturbs me with the joy             

Of elevated thoughts; a sense sublime    

Of something far more deeply interfused,            

Whose dwelling is the light of setting suns,          

And the round ocean, and the living air,

And the blue sky, and in the mind of man,     100

A motion and a spirit, that impels            

All thinking things, all objects of all thought,        

And rolls through all things. Therefore am I still  

A lover of the meadows and the woods,

And mountains; and of all that we behold            

From this green earth; of all the mighty world    

Of eye and ear, both what they half-create,*      

And what perceive; well pleased to recognize     

In nature and the language of the sense,              

The anchor of my purest thoughts, the nurse,  110

The guide, the guardian of my heart, and soul    

Of all my moral being.

 

                                     Nor, perchance,      

If I were not thus taught, should I the more         

Suffer my genial spirits to decay:              

For thou art with me, here, upon the banks         

Of this fair river; thou, my dearest Friend,            

My dear, dear Friend, and in thy voice I catch     

The language of my former heart, and read         

My former pleasures in the shooting lights          

Of thy wild eyes. Oh! yet a little while       120

May I behold in thee what I was once,   

My dear, dear Sister! And this prayer I make,      

Knowing that Nature never did betray    

The heart that loved her; 'tis her privilege,           

Through all the years of this our life, to lead        

From joy to joy: for she can so inform     

The mind that is within us, so impress    

With quietness and beauty, and so feed

With lofty thoughts, that neither evil tongues,    

Rash judgments, nor the sneers of selfish men,   130

Nor greetings where no kindness is, nor all          

The dreary intercourse of daily life,         

Shall e'er prevail against us, or disturb    

Our chearful faith that all which we behold          

Is full of blessings. Therefore let the moon           

Shine on thee in thy solitary walk;           

And let the misty mountain winds be free            

To blow against thee: and in after years,

When these wild ecstasies shall be matured        

Into a sober pleasure, when thy mind          140

Shall be a mansion for all lovely forms,  

Thy memory be as a dwelling-place         

For all sweet sounds and harmonies; Oh! then,  

If solitude, or fear, or pain, or grief,        

Should be thy portion, with what healing thoughts           

Of tender joy wilt thou remember me,   

And these my exhortations! Nor, perchance,       

If I should be, where I no more can hear

Thy voice, nor catch from thy wild eyes these gleams      

Of past existence, wilt thou then forget        150

That on the banks of this delightful stream          

We stood together; and that I, so long   

A worshipper of Nature, hither came,    

Unwearied in that service: rather say     

With warmer love, oh! with far deeper zeal         

Of holier love. Nor wilt thou then forget,             

That after many wanderings, many years             

Of absence, these steep woods and lofty cliffs,  

And this green pastoral landscape, were to me   

More dear, both for themselves and for thy sake.   160

 

 

 

 

Ode

Intimations of Immortality from Recollections of Early Childhood

 

THERE was a time when meadow, grove, and stream,     

    The earth, and every common sight,   

            To me did seem  

    Apparell'd in celestial light,     

The glory and the freshness of a dream.         

It is not now as it hath been of yore;—   

        Turn wheresoe'er I may,      

            By night or day,   

The things which I have seen I now can see no more.      

 

        The rainbow comes and goes,                                10

        And lovely is the rose;          

        The moon doth with delight              

    Look round her when the heavens are bare;    

        Waters on a starry night      

        Are beautiful and fair;            

    The sunshine is a glorious birth;           

    But yet I know, where'er I go,

That there hath pass'd away a glory from the earth.        

 

Now, while the birds thus sing a joyous song,     

    And while the young lambs bound                            20

        As to the tabor's sound,       

To me alone there came a thought of grief:         

A timely utterance gave that thought relief,        

        And I again am strong:         

The cataracts blow their trumpets from the steep;             

No more shall grief of mine the season wrong;   

I hear the echoes through the mountains throng,             

The winds come to me from the fields of sleep,  

        And all the earth is gay;       

            Land and sea                                                        30

    Give themselves up to jollity, 

      And with the heart of May    

    Doth every beast keep holiday;—        

          Thou Child of Joy, 

Shout round me, let me hear thy shouts, thou happy         

    Shepherd-boy!             

 

Ye blessèd creatures, I have heard the call           

    Ye to each other make; I see  

The heavens laugh with you in your jubilee;         

    My heart is at your festival,                                   40

      My head hath its coronal,     

The fulness of your bliss, I feel—I feel it all.         

        O evil day! if I were sullen   

        While Earth herself is adorning,        

            This sweet May-morning,  

        And the children are culling

            On every side,     

        In a thousand valleys far and wide, 

        Fresh flowers; while the sun shines warm,   

And the babe leaps up on his mother's arm:—       50

        I hear, I hear, with joy I hear!            

        —But there's a tree, of many, one, 

A single field which I have look'd upon,  

Both of them speak of something that is gone:   

          The pansy at my feet          

          Doth the same tale repeat:              

Whither is fled the visionary gleam?       

Where is it now, the glory and the dream?           

 

Our birth is but a sleep and a forgetting:

The Soul that rises with us, our life's Star,               60

        Hath had elsewhere its setting,        

          And cometh from afar:      

        Not in entire forgetfulness, 

        And not in utter nakedness,               

But trailing clouds of glory do we come   

        From God, who is our home:             

Heaven lies about us in our infancy!        

Shades of the prison-house begin to close           

        Upon the growing Boy,        

But he beholds the light, and whence it flows,       70

        He sees it in his joy;              

The Youth, who daily farther from the east          

    Must travel, still is Nature's priest,      

      And by the vision splendid     

      Is on his way attended;          

At length the Man perceives it die away,              

And fade into the light of common day. 

 

Earth fills her lap with pleasures of her own;       

Yearnings she hath in her own natural kind,         

And, even with something of a mother's mind,      80

        And no unworthy aim,         

    The homely nurse doth all she can      

To make her foster-child, her Inmate Man,          

    Forget the glories he hath known,       

And that imperial palace whence he came.          

 

Behold the Child among his new-born blisses,     

A six years' darling of a pigmy size!          

See, where 'mid work of his own hand he lies,    

Fretted by sallies of his mother's kisses, 

With light upon him from his father's eyes!            90

See, at his feet, some little plan or chart,              

Some fragment from his dream of human life,    

Shaped by himself with newly-learnèd art;          

    A wedding or a festival,           

    A mourning or a funeral;            

        And this hath now his heart,             

    And unto this he frames his song:        

        Then will he fit his tongue   

To dialogues of business, love, or strife; 

        But it will not be long                                        100

        Ere this be thrown aside,     

        And with new joy and pride

The little actor cons another part;            

Filling from time to time his 'humorous stage'    

With all the Persons, down to palsied Age,            

That Life brings with her in her equipage;             

        As if his whole vocation       

        Were endless imitation.       

 

Thou, whose exterior semblance doth belie         

        Thy soul's immensity;                                       110

Thou best philosopher, who yet dost keep           

Thy heritage, thou eye among the blind,

That, deaf and silent, read'st the eternal deep,   

Haunted for ever by the eternal mind,—               

        Mighty prophet! Seer blest!              

        On whom those truths do rest,        

Which we are toiling all our lives to find,              

In darkness lost, the darkness of the grave;         

Thou, over whom thy Immortality            

Broods like the Day, a master o'er a slave,            120

A presence which is not to be put by;     

          To whom the grave             

Is but a lonely bed without the sense or sight      

        Of day or the warm light,    

A place of thought where we in waiting lie;         

Thou little Child, yet glorious in the might            

Of heaven-born freedom on thy being's height,  

Why with such earnest pains dost thou provoke

The years to bring the inevitable yoke,   

Thus blindly with thy blessedness at strife?           130

Full soon thy soul shall have her earthly freight, 

And custom lie upon thee with a weight,              

Heavy as frost, and deep almost as life! 

 

        O joy! that in our embers    

        Is something that doth live,

        That nature yet remembers

        What was so fugitive!           

The thought of our past years in me doth breed 

Perpetual benediction: not indeed           

For that which is most worthy to be blest—             140

Delight and liberty, the simple creed       

Of childhood, whether busy or at rest,   

With new-fledged hope still fluttering in his breast:—     

        Not for these I raise              

        The song of thanks and praise;         

    But for those obstinate questionings   

    Of sense and outward things, 

    Fallings from us, vanishings;    

    Blank misgivings of a Creature              

Moving about in worlds not realized,                          150

High instincts before which our mortal Nature    

Did tremble like a guilty thing surprised:

        But for those first affections,            

        Those shadowy recollections,           

      Which, be they what they may,          

Are yet the fountain-light of all our day,

Are yet a master-light of all our seeing;  

  Uphold us, cherish, and have power to make    

Our noisy years seem moments in the being       

Of the eternal Silence: truths that wake,                 160

            To perish never:  

Which neither listlessness, nor mad endeavour, 

            Nor Man nor Boy,             

Nor all that is at enmity with joy,             

Can utterly abolish or destroy!   

    Hence in a season of calm weather     

        Though inland far we be,    

Our souls have sight of that immortal sea            

        Which brought us hither,     

    Can in a moment travel thither,                          170

And see the children sport upon the shore,         

And hear the mighty waters rolling evermore.    

 

Then sing, ye birds, sing, sing a joyous song!       

        And let the young lambs bound        

        As to the tabor's sound!      

We in thought will join your throng,        

      Ye that pipe and ye that play,             

      Ye that through your hearts to-day   

      Feel the gladness of the May!             

What though the radiance which was once so bright   180

Be now for ever taken from my sight,     

    Though nothing can bring back the hour           

Of splendour in the grass, of glory in the flower;

      We will grieve not, rather find            

      Strength in what remains behind;      

      In the primal sympathy          

      Which having been must ever be;      

      In the soothing thoughts that spring 

      Out of human suffering;        

      In the faith that looks through death,               190

In years that bring the philosophic mind.              

 

And O ye Fountains, Meadows, Hills, and Groves,             

Forebode not any severing of our loves!

Yet in my heart of hearts I feel your might;          

I only have relinquish'd one delight         

To live beneath your more habitual sway.            

I love the brooks which down their channels fret,             

Even more than when I tripp'd lightly as they;     

The innocent brightness of a new-born Day         

            Is lovely yet;                                                   200

The clouds that gather round the setting sun      

Do take a sober colouring from an eye   

That hath kept watch o'er man's mortality;          

Another race hath been, and other palms are won.          

Thanks to the human heart by which we live,      

Thanks to its tenderness, its joys, and fears,        

To me the meanest flower that blows can give   

Thoughts that do often lie too deep for tears.